Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29325704›Full record

ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow surgery2018

Psychometrics of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function instrument administered by computerized adaptive testing and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand in the orthopedic elbow patient population.

Man Hung, Maren W Voss, Jerry Bounsanga, Yushan Gu, Erin K Granger, Robert Z Tashjian

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05618080 (GRASP-01-003), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05618080 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

GRASP-01-003: Trial Readiness and Endpoint Assessment in LGMD R1

TypeobservationalSponsorVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRan2024 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsCalpain-3 Deficiency Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Type 2A, Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy, Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Type R1, LGMD2A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preoperative Evaluation of the Lower Extremity-SpecificArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  13. Association of Patient-reported Outcomes With Clinical Outcomes After Distal Humerus Fracture Treatment.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Man HungDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: Man.Hung@hsc.utah.edu.
Maren W VossDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jerry BounsangaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Yushan GuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Erin K GrangerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Robert Z TashjianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Improving Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Orthopaedic Research and PracticeU01AR067138 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HUNG, MAN · 2014 to 2016
$590k
NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR067138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) instrument administered through computerized adaptive testing (CAT) compared with the traditional full-length Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH).

methodsThe PROMIS PF CAT and the DASH were administered to 1759 patients seeking care for elbow conditions. This study used Rasch partial credit modeling to analyze the instruments with item fit, internal reliability, response category thresholds, dimensionality, local independence, gender differential item functioning, and floor and ceiling effects.

resultsThe PROMIS PF CAT and DASH had satisfactory item fit for all but 1 item on both measures. Internal reliabilities were high for both measures. Two items on the DASH and 4 items on the PF CAT showed nonordered category thresholds. Unidimensionality was adequate, and local independence was supported for both instruments. Gender bias was found for 4 items on the PF CAT and 12 items on the DASH. Both measures had adequate instrument targeting and satisfactory floor and ceiling effects.

conclusionThe PROMIS PF CAT and the DASH both showed sufficient unidimensionality, good item fit, and good local independence with the exception of high levels of gender item bias, particularly for the DASH. Further scale evaluation should address item bias and item response categories for these instruments. Overall, the PROMIS PF CAT is an effective outcome instrument to measure function in patients with elbow disorders that requires significantly fewer questions than the DASH.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedArmComputersElbow JointFemaleHandHumansJoint DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsShoulderSurveys and QuestionnairesDASHelboworthopedicsphysical functionPROMISpsychometric

Identifiers

PMID29325704
PMCPMC5811400
OpenAlexW2784316861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.