Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29325606›Full record

ReviewHandbook of clinical neurology2018

Repeat expansion diseases.

Henry Paulson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of clinical neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 275 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
275citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
66.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

275 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 425 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Disruption of RNA metabolism and its impact on protein homeostasis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Technologies for engineering repetitive DNA.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Long-read sequencing for neurological disorders: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

215 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henry PaulsonDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: henryp@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG053760 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2016 to 2020
$10.1M
Mechanisms of Polyglutamine NeurodegenerationR01NS038712 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PAULSON, HENRY L · 2000 to 2019
$8.1M
Supplementary funding for U01NS104326 Clinical Trial Readiness for SCA1 and SCA3 (“READISCA”)U01NS104326 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ASHIZAWA, TETSUO, DURR, ALEXANDRA · 2018 to 2022
$6.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG053760NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038712NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS104326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 40 diseases, most of which primarily affect the nervous system, are caused by expansions of simple sequence repeats dispersed throughout the human genome. Expanded trinucleotide repeat diseases were discovered first and remain the most frequent. More recently tetra-, penta-, hexa-, and even dodeca-nucleotide repeat expansions have been identified as the cause of human disease, including some of the most common genetic disorders seen by neurologists. Repeat expansion diseases include both causes of myotonic dystrophy (DM1 and DM2), the most common genetic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia (C9ORF72), Huntington disease, and eight other polyglutamine disorders, including the most common forms of dominantly inherited ataxia, the most common recessive ataxia (Friedreich ataxia), and the most common heritable mental retardation (fragile X syndrome). Here I review distinctive features of this group of diseases that stem from the unusual, dynamic nature of the underlying mutations. These features include marked clinical heterogeneity and the phenomenon of clinical anticipation. I then discuss the diverse molecular mechanisms driving disease pathogenesis, which vary depending on the repeat sequence, size, and location within the disease gene, and whether the repeat is translated into protein. I conclude with a brief clinical and genetic description of individual repeat expansion diseases that are most relevant to neurologists.

Indexed as

HumansNervous System DiseasesRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidanticipationC9ORF72expanded repeatsmyotonic dystrophypolyglutamine diseasesrepeat instabilityspinocerebellar ataxiatrinucleotide

Identifiers

PMID29325606
PMCPMC6485936
OpenAlexW2783973318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.