Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29325601›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2018

Evaluation of ELISA and haemagglutination inhibition as screening tests in serosurveillance for H5/H7 avian influenza in commercial chicken flocks.

M E Arnold, M J Slomka, A C Breed, C K Hjulsager, S Pritz-Verschuren, S Venema-Kemper, R J Bouwstra, R Trebbien, S Zohari, V Ceeraz and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M E ArnoldDepartment of Epidemiological Sciences (Biomathematics and Risk Research),Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA),The Elms,College Road,Sutton Bonington,Loughborough LE12 5RB,UK.
M J SlomkaEuropean Union Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease,APHA-Weybridge,Woodham Lane,Addlestone KT15 3NB,UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-5073
A C BreedEuropean Union Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease,APHA-Weybridge,Woodham Lane,Addlestone KT15 3NB,UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-9510
C K HjulsagerNational Veterinary Institute,Technical University of Denmark (DTU),Kemitorvet, Building 204, 2800 Lyngby,Denmark.
S Pritz-VerschurenWageningen Bioveterinary Research,Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad,The Netherlands.
S Venema-KemperWageningen Bioveterinary Research,Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad,The Netherlands.
R J BouwstraWageningen Bioveterinary Research,Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad,The Netherlands.
R TrebbienNational Veterinary Institute,Technical University of Denmark (DTU),Kemitorvet, Building 204, 2800 Lyngby,Denmark.
S ZohariNational Veterinary Institute (SVA),Ulls väg 2B, Uppsala,Sweden.
V CeerazEuropean Union Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease,APHA-Weybridge,Woodham Lane,Addlestone KT15 3NB,UK.
L E LarsenNational Veterinary Institute,Technical University of Denmark (DTU),Kemitorvet, Building 204, 2800 Lyngby,Denmark.
R J ManvellEuropean Union Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease,APHA-Weybridge,Woodham Lane,Addlestone KT15 3NB,UK.
G KochWageningen Bioveterinary Research,Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad,The Netherlands.
I H BrownEuropean Union Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease,APHA-Weybridge,Woodham Lane,Addlestone KT15 3NB,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian influenza virus (AIV) subtypes H5 and H7 can infect poultry causing low pathogenicity (LP) AI, but these LPAIVs may mutate to highly pathogenic AIV in chickens or turkeys causing high mortality, hence H5/H7 subtypes demand statutory intervention. Serological surveillance in the European Union provides evidence of H5/H7 AIV exposure in apparently healthy poultry. To identify the most sensitive screening method as the first step in an algorithm to provide evidence of H5/H7 AIV infection, the standard approach of H5/H7 antibody testing by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) was compared with an ELISA, which detects antibodies to all subtypes. Sera (n = 1055) from 74 commercial chicken flocks were tested by both methods. A Bayesian approach served to estimate diagnostic test sensitivities and specificities, without assuming any 'gold standard'. Sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA was 97% and 99.8%, and for H5/H7 HI 43% and 99.8%, respectively, although H5/H7 HI sensitivity varied considerably between infected flocks. ELISA therefore provides superior sensitivity for the screening of chicken flocks as part of an algorithm, which subsequently utilises H5/H7 HI to identify infection by these two subtypes. With the calculated sensitivity and specificity, testing nine sera per flock is sufficient to detect a flock seroprevalence of 30% with 95% probability.

Indexed as

ChickensAnimalsAntibodies, ViralDenmarkEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEuropeHemagglutination Inhibition TestsInfluenza in BirdsNetherlandsPoultry DiseasesPrevalenceSensitivity and SpecificitySeroepidemiologic StudiesSerogroupSwedenUnited KingdomAntibodies, ViralAIV (avian influenza virus)BayesianELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay)H5/H7 AIV surveillanceHI (haemagglutination inhibition)

Identifiers

PMID29325601
PMCPMC9134519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.