Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29325402›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2018

Assessing Patient Organization Participation in Health Policy: A Comparative Study in France and Italy.

Kyriakos Souliotis, Eirini Agapidaki, Lily Evangelia Peppou, Chara Tzavara, Dimitrios Varvaras, Oreste Claudio Buonomo, Dominique Debiais, Stanimir Hasurdjiev, Francois Sarkozy

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Promoting Patient Safety Through Patient Engagement at the Organisational Level: A Delphi-Based Needs Assessment Among Patient and Family Advisory Councils.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Stakeholder opinions on value in healthcare.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Health democracy in Europe: Cancer patient organization participation in health policy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kyriakos SouliotisFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Greece.
Eirini AgapidakiFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Greece.
Lily Evangelia PeppouCommunity Mental Health Centre, University Mental Health Research Institute, Athens, Greece.
Chara TzavaraFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Greece.
Dimitrios VarvarasDepartment of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Oreste Claudio BuonomoDepartment of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Dominique DebiaisEuropa Donna France, Paris, France.
Stanimir HasurdjievBulgarian National Patients' Organization, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Francois SarkozyFSNB Health & Care, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven though there are many patient organizations across Europe, their role in impacting health policy decisions and reforms has not been well documented. In line with this, the present study endeavours to fill this gap in the international literature. To this end, it aims to validate further a previously developed instrument (the Health Democracy Index - HDI) measuring patient organization participation in health policy decision-making. In addition, by utilizing this tool, it aims to provide a snapshot of the degree and impact of cancer patient organization (CPO) participation in Italy and France.

methodsA convenient sample of 188 members of CPOs participated in the study (95 respondents from 10 CPOs in Italy and 93 from 12 CPOs in France). Participants completed online a self-reported questionnaire, encompassing the 9-item index and questions enquiring about the type and impact of participation in various facets of health policy decisionmaking. The psychometric properties of the scale were explored by performing factor analysis (construct validity) and by computing Cronbach α (internal consistency).

resultsFindings indicate that the index has good internal consistency and the construct it taps is unidimensional. The degree and impact of CPO participation in health policy decision-making were found to be low in both countries; however in Italy they were comparatively lower than in France.

conclusionIn conclusion, the HDI can be effectively used in international policy and research contexts. CPOs participation is low in Italy and France and concerted efforts should be made on upgrading their role in health policy decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth PolicyOrganizationsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedFemaleFranceHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsCancer Patient Organizations (CPOs)Health Policy Decision-MakingPatient ParticipationScale Development

Identifiers

PMID29325402
PMCPMC5745867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.