ArticleAnnals of botany2018
Introducing turgor-driven growth dynamics into functional-structural plant models.
Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive modeling, pattern recognition, and spatiotemporal representations of plant growth in simulated and controlled environments: A comprehensive review.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Turgor-driven plant growth applied in a soybean functional-structural plant model.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Internal trophic pressure, a regulator of plant development? Insights from a stochastic functional-structural plant growth model applied to Coffea trees.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Determinants of legacy effects in pine trees - implications from an irrigation-stop experiment.The New phytologist · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: In many scenarios the availability of assimilated carbon is not the constraining factor of plant growth. Rather, organ growth appears driven by sink activity in which water availability plays a determinant role. Current functional-structural plant models (FSPMs) mainly focus on plant-carbon relations and largely disregard the importance of plant water status in organogenesis. Consequently, incorporating a turgor-driven growth concept, coupling carbon and water dynamics in an FSPM, presents a significant improvement towards capturing plant development in a more mechanistic manner. Methods: An existing process-based water flow and storage model served as a basis for implementing water control in FSPMs. Its concepts were adjusted to the scale of individual plant organs and interwoven with the basic principles of modelling carbon dynamics to allow evaluation of turgor pressure across the entire plant. This was then linked to plant organ growth by applying the principles of the widely used Lockhart equation. Key results: This model successfully integrates a mechanistic understanding of plant water transport dynamics coupled with simple carbon dynamics within a dynamically developing plant architecture. It allows evaluation of turgor pressure on the scale of plant organs, resulting in clear diel and long-term patterns, directly linked to plant organ growth. Conclusions: A conceptual sap flow and turgor-driven growth model was introduced for functional-structural plant modelling. It is applicable to any plant architecture and allows visual exploration of the diel patterns of organ water content and growth. Integrated in existing FSPMs, this new concept fosters an array of possibilities for FSPMs, as it presents a different formulation of growth in terms of local processes, influenced by local and external conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.