Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29324865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Association of circadian rhythm genes ARNTL/BMAL1 and CLOCK with multiple sclerosis.

Polona Lavtar, Gorazd Rudolf, Aleš Maver, Alenka Hodžić, Nada Starčević Čizmarević, Maja Živković, Saša Šega Jazbec, Zalika Klemenc Ketiš, Miljenko Kapović, Evica Dinčić and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Circadian Control of Glial Cell Homeodynamics.Journal of biological rhythms · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Polymorphisms inBiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Melatonin signalling in Schwann cells during neuroregeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Polona LavtarClinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gorazd RudolfClinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aleš MaverClinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Alenka HodžićClinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nada Starčević ČizmarevićDepartments of Biology and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Maja ŽivkovićLaboratories of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute of Nuclear Sciences "Vinča", Belgrade, Serbia.
Saša Šega JazbecDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Zalika Klemenc KetišDepartments of Family Medicine, Medical School, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Miljenko KapovićDepartments of Biology and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Evica DinčićDepartments of Neurology, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ranko RaičevićDepartments of Neurology, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Juraj SepčićPostgraduate Studies, School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Luca LovrečićClinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aleksandra StankovićLaboratories of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute of Nuclear Sciences "Vinča", Belgrade, Serbia.
Smiljana RistićDepartments of Biology and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Borut PeterlinClinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Rijeka · HRMilitary Medical Academy · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevalence of multiple sclerosis varies with geographic latitude. We hypothesized that this fact might be partially associated with the influence of latitude on circadian rhythm and consequently that genetic variability of key circadian rhythm regulators, ARNTL and CLOCK genes, might contribute to the risk for multiple sclerosis. Our aim was to analyse selected polymorphisms of ARNTL and CLOCK, and their association with multiple sclerosis. A total of 900 Caucasian patients and 1024 healthy controls were compared for genetic signature at 8 SNPs, 4 for each of both genes. We found a statistically significant difference in genotype (ARNTL rs3789327, P = 7.5·10-5; CLOCK rs6811520 P = 0.02) distributions in patients and controls. The ARNTL rs3789327 CC genotype was associated with higher risk for multiple sclerosis at an OR of 1.67 (95% CI 1.35-2.07, P = 0.0001) and the CLOCK rs6811520 genotype CC at an OR of 1.40 (95% CI 1.13-1.73, P = 0.002). The results of this study suggest that genetic variability in the ARNTL and CLOCK genes might be associated with risk for multiple sclerosis.

Indexed as

AdultARNTL Transcription FactorsCircadian RhythmCLOCK ProteinsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisRetrospective StudiesARNTL Transcription FactorsBMAL1 protein, humanCLOCK protein, humanCLOCK Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29324865
PMCPMC5764259
OpenAlexW2783836699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.