Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29324851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Development and validation of the Vietnamese primary care assessment tool.

Nguyen Thi Hoa, Nguyen Minh Tam, Wim Peersman, Anselme Derese, Jeffrey F Markuns

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nguyen Thi HoaDepartment of Family Medicine, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-2866-1519
Nguyen Minh TamDepartment of Family Medicine, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Wim PeersmanSocial and Community Work, Odisee University College, Brussels, Belgium.
Anselme DereseDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jeffrey F MarkunsGlobal Health Collaborative, Department of Family Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo adapt the consumer version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) for Vietnam and determine its internal consistency and validity.

designA quantitative cross sectional study.

setting56 communes in 3 representative provinces of central Vietnam.

participantsTotal of 3289 people who used health care services at health facility at least once over the past two years.

resultsThe Vietnamese adult expanded consumer version of the PCAT (VN PCAT-AE) is an instrument for evaluation of primary care in Vietnam with 70 items comprising six scales representing four core primary care domains, and three additional scales representing three derivative domains. Sixteen other items from the original tool were not included in the final instrument, due to problems with missing values, floor or ceiling effects, and item-total correlations. All the retained scales have a Cronbach's alpha above 0.70 except for the subscale of Family Centeredness.

conclusionsThe VN PCAT-AE demonstrates adequate internal consistency and validity to be used as an effective tool for measuring the quality of primary care in Vietnam from the consumer perspective. Additional work in the future to optimize valid measurement in all domains consistent with the original version of the tool may be helpful as the primary care system in Vietnam further develops.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingVietnamYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29324851
PMCPMC5764365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.