Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29324848›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Platelet-rich plasma to treat experimentally-induced skin wounds in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adolfo Maria Tambella, Anna Rita Attili, Gilles Dupré, Andrea Cantalamessa, Stefano Martin, Vincenzo Cuteri, Sabrina Marcazzan, Massimo Del Fabbro

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04829370 (Clinical Application of Patented Lyophilized PLT in Acne Scar Repairment.), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04829370 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Application of Patented Lyophilized PLT in Acne Scar Repairment.

TypeinterventionalSponsorShin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled15ConditionsAtrophic Acne ScarArmsPLT, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adolfo Maria TambellaSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, MC, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6590-1876
Anna Rita AttiliSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, MC, Italy.
Gilles DupréClinic for Small Animal Surgery, Department for Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medicine University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea CantalamessaSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, MC, Italy.
Stefano MartinSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, MC, Italy.
Vincenzo CuteriSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, MC, Italy.
Sabrina MarcazzanDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Massimo Del FabbroDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Università di Camerino · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to review current literature to determine whether the topical application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) promotes healing in experimentally-induced full-thickness skin wounds in animals. The hypothesis was that the adjunct of PRP has a positive effect on wound healing. An electronic search was carried out on the following databases: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Research Gate, Cochrane Wounds Group, Veterinary Information Network. No publication date nor language restrictions were applied. Randomised and not randomised controlled clinical trials comparing PRP with placebo or with other treatments were included. The reduction of open wound area in PRP-treated (test) wounds compared to control wounds was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were healing time and number of healed cases in test group compared to control. The following effect sizes were calculated: the Hedges' g for continuous variables; the odds ratio for binary data. Eighteen controlled clinical trials were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis, with a total of 661 wounds. All studies were published in the period 2007-2016. Eight studies were carried out on rodent/lagomorph mammals and 10 on non-rodent/lagomorph mammals. In all included studies, control wounds underwent placebo or were left untreated. The PRP group showed a better healing performance than the control group in each outcome. The effect size was statistically significant considering the primary outcome and the overall aggregation of the three outcomes. The effect size, although in favour of the treatment with PRP, was not significant considering the healing time and the number of healings. The overall heterogeneity was mild or moderate. Five studies reported a high risk of selection bias. The publication bias was always mild or absent. The results support the hypothesis of the positive effects of the PRP when compared to control groups in the treatment of experimentally-induced full-thickness skin wounds in animals. PRP can therefore be considered an effective adjunctive therapy in stimulating second intention healing of acute wounds in healthy animals.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaAnimalsSkinWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID29324848
PMCPMC5764374
OpenAlexW2782583839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.