ArticlePloS one2018
Correction: Economic evaluation of the one-hour rule-out and rule-in algorithm for acute myocardial infarction using the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay in the emergency department.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical performance validation and four diagnostic strategy assessments of high-sensitivity troponin I assays.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cost effectiveness of a 1-hour high-sensitivity troponin-T protocol: An analysis of the RAPID-TnT trial.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- The feasibility of using Hcy, CRP, and Cys-C to analyze AMI patients' disease conditions and prognoses.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Investigation of the value of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and coronary artery lesions in prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention patients.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- The application of Gensini score and IL-1ra in assessing the condition and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187662.].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.