Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29324738›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Population structure analysis of the neglected parasite Thelazia callipaeda revealed high genetic diversity in Eastern Asia isolates.

Xi Zhang, Ya Li Shi, Lu Lu Han, Chen Xiong, Shi Qi Yi, Peng Jiang, Zeng Xian Wang, Ji Long Shen, Jing Cui, Zhong Quan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current understanding ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Eye to eye withCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Wild Japanese Marten,Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Laboratory Culture and Life Cycle ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genotyping and Phylogenetic Position ofFrontiers in genetics · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xi ZhangDepartment of Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ya Li ShiDepartment of Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lu Lu HanDepartment of Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chen XiongDepartment of Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shi Qi YiDepartment of Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Peng JiangDepartment of Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zeng Xian WangDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Ji Long ShenDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Jing CuiDepartment of Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8726-5498
Zhong Quan WangDepartment of Parasitology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhengzhou University · CNAnhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThelazia callipaeda is the causative agent of thelaziasis in canids, felids and humans. However, the population genetic structure regarding this parasite remains unclear. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study, we first explored the genetic variation of 32 T. callipaeda clinical isolates using the following multi-molecular markers: cox1, cytb, 12S rDNA, ITS1 and 18S rDNA. The isolates were collected from 13 patients from 11 geographical locations in China. Next, the population structure of T. callipaeda from Europe and other Asian countries was analyzed using the cox1 sequences collected during this study and from the GenBank database. In general, the Chinese clinical isolates of T. callipaeda expressed high genetic diversity. Based on the cox1 gene, a total of 21 haplotypes were identified. One only circulated in European countries (Hap1), while the other 20 haplotypes were dispersed in Korea, Japan and China. There were five nucleotide positions in the cox1 sequences that were confirmed as invariable among individuals from Europe and Asia, but the sequences were distinct between these two regions. Population differences between Europe and Asian countries were greater than those among China, Korea and Japan. The T. callipaeda populations from Europe and Asia should be divided into two separate sub-populations. These two groups started to diverge during the middle Pleistocene. Neutrality tests, mismatch distribution and Bayesian skyline plot (BSP) analysis all rejected possible population expansion of T. callipaeda.

conclusionsThe Asian population of T. callipaeda has a high level of genetic diversity, but further studies should be performed to explore the biology, ecology and epidemiology of T. callipaeda.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsAsia, EasternChinaCluster AnalysisCytochromes bDNA, HelminthDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerElectron Transport Complex IVEuropeHaplotypesHumansPhylogenyRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18SCytochromes bDNA, HelminthDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerElectron Transport Complex IVRNA, RibosomalRNA, ribosomal, 12SRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID29324738
PMCPMC5783425
OpenAlexW2783725605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.