Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29324562›Full record

SynthesisJBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports2018

Effectiveness of interventions to prevent pre-frailty and frailty progression in older adults: a systematic review.

João Apóstolo, Richard Cooke, Elzbieta Bobrowicz-Campos, Silvina Santana, Maura Marcucci, Antonio Cano, Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten, Federico Germini, Barbara D'Avanzo, Holly Gwyther and 1 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 296 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
296citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05002439 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial to Analyze the Efficacy of a Spanish Healthcare ministRy Based In InTervention to Reduce Frailty Status in Prefrail Older Adults (FRAILMERIT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de AlbaceteRan2020 to 2025Enrolled273ConditionsFrailty, Aged, ExerciseArmsMulticomponent physical exercise program and a nutritional intervention
NCT07136168 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Healthy Ageing - an Interdisciplinary Randomised Study of Health Dialogues in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2025 to 2031Enrolled2,952ConditionsFrailty, Ageing Well, Prevention Intervention, Health Related Quality of LifeArmsHealth dialogue
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

296 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Digital Cognitive Rehabilitation Platforms for Older Adults in Portugal: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Delirium among older adults living at home: a systematic review of prevalence, incidence, and risk factors.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Multidimensional factors affecting homebound older adults: A systematic review.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

236 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

João ApóstoloHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, Portugal Centre for Evidence Based Practice: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence.
Richard CookeAston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing (ARCHA), Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Elzbieta Bobrowicz-CamposHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, Portugal Centre for Evidence Based Practice: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence.
Silvina SantanaDepartment of Economics, Management and Industrial Engineering, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Maura MarcucciGeriatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Antonio CanoDepartment of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Universitat de Valência, Valência, Spain.
Miriam Vollenbroek-HuttenRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Federico GerminiDepartment. of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Barbara D'AvanzoIRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.
Holly GwytherAston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing (ARCHA), Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Carol HollandAston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing (ARCHA), Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions for preventing frailty progression in older adults.

introductionFrailty is an age-related state of decreased physiological reserves characterized by an increased risk of poor clinical outcomes. Evidence supporting the malleability of frailty, its prevention and treatment, has been presented. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review considered studies on older adults aged 65 and over, explicitly identified as pre-frail or frail, who had been undergoing interventions focusing on the prevention of frailty progression. Participants selected on the basis of specific illness or with a terminal diagnosis were excluded. The comparator was usual care, alternative therapeutic interventions or no intervention. The primary outcome was frailty. Secondary outcomes included: (i) cognition, quality of life, activities of daily living, caregiver burden, functional capacity, depression and other mental health-related outcomes, self-perceived health and social engagement; (ii) drugs and prescriptions, analytical parameters, adverse outcomes and comorbidities; (iii) costs, and/or costs relative to benefits and/or savings associated with implementing the interventions for frailty. Experimental study designs, cost effectiveness, cost benefit, cost minimization and cost utility studies were considered for inclusion.

methodsDatabases for published and unpublished studies, available in English, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian and Dutch, from January 2001 to November 2015, were searched. Critical appraisal was conducted using standardized instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data was extracted using the standardized tools designed for quantitative and economic studies. Data was presented in a narrative form due to the heterogeneity of included studies.

resultsTwenty-one studies, all randomized controlled trials, with a total of 5275 older adults and describing 33 interventions, met the criteria for inclusion. Economic analyses were conducted in two studies. Physical exercise programs were shown to be generally effective for reducing or postponing frailty but only when conducted in groups. Favorable effects on frailty indicators were also observed after the interventions, based on physical exercise with supplementation, supplementation alone, cognitive training and combined treatment. Group meetings and home visits were not found to be universally effective. Lack of efficacy was evidenced for physical exercise performed individually or delivered one-to-one, hormone supplementation and problem solving therapy. Individually tailored management programs for clinical conditions had inconsistent effects on frailty prevalence. Economic studies demonstrated that this type of intervention, as compared to usual care, provided better value for money, particularly for very frail community-dwelling participants, and had favorable effects in some of the frailty-related outcomes in inpatient and outpatient management, without increasing costs.

conclusionsThis review found mixed results regarding the effectiveness of frailty interventions. However, there is clear evidence on the usefulness of such interventions in carefully chosen evidence-based circumstances, both for frailty itself and for secondary outcomes, supporting clinical investment of resources in frailty intervention. Further research is required to reinforce current evidence and examine the impact of the initial level of frailty on the benefits of different interventions. There is also a need for economic evaluation of frailty interventions.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalDisease ProgressionFrailtyAgedHumansIndependent LivingPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID29324562
PMCPMC5771690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.