Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29324305›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2018

Caveolin-mediated endocytosis of the Chlamydia M278 outer membrane peptide encapsulated in poly(lactic acid)-Poly(ethylene glycol) nanoparticles by mouse primary dendritic cells enhances specific immune effectors mediated by MHC class II and CD4

Saurabh Dixit, Rajnish Sahu, Richa Verma, Skyla Duncan, Guillermo H Giambartolomei, Shree R Singh, Vida A Dennis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Visualization of Vaccine Dynamics with Quantum Dots for Immunotherapy.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. TheFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Saurabh DixitCenter for NanoBiotechnology Research, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA.
Rajnish SahuCenter for NanoBiotechnology Research, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA.
Richa VermaCenter for NanoBiotechnology Research, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA.
Skyla DuncanCenter for NanoBiotechnology Research, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA.
Guillermo H GiambartolomeiInstituto de Inmunología, Genética y Metabolismo (INIGEM), CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Shree R SinghCenter for NanoBiotechnology Research, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA.
Vida A DennisCenter for NanoBiotechnology Research, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA. Electronic address: vdennis@alasu.edu.
Alabama State University · USUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI OLAF KUTSCH · 1988 to 2026
$84.1M
RISE Option II:NIGMS-Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement (RISE) Program at ASUR25GM106995 · NIGMS · ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DENNIS, VIDA A · 2013 to 2023
$3.0M
Mechanisms and protective efficacy of nanovaccines against Chlamydia trachomatisR21AI111159 · NIAID · ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DENNIS, VIDA A · 2014 to 2015
$341k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027767NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI111159NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM106995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously developed a Chlamydia trachomatis nanovaccine (PPM) by encapsulating a chlamydial M278 peptide within poly(lactic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) biodegradable nanoparticles that immunopotentiated Chlamydia-specific immune effector responses in mice. Herein, we investigated the mechanistic interactions of PPM with mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (DCs) for its uptake, trafficking, and T cell activation. Our results reveal that PPM triggered enhanced expression of effector cytokines and chemokines, surface activation markers (Cd1d2, Fcgr1), pathogen-sensing receptors (TLR2, Nod1), co-stimulatory (CD40, CD80, CD86) and MHC class I and II molecules. Co-culturing of PPM-primed DCs with T cells from C. muridarum vaccinated mice yielded an increase in Chlamydia-specific immune effector responses including CD3

Indexed as

AnimalsCaveolinsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationChlamydia muridarumDendritic CellsEndocytosisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleLactatesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsCaveolinsLactatesPolyethylene Glycolspoly(lactic acid-ethylene glycol)CaveolinChlamydia muridarumDendritic cellsEndocytosisNanovaccinePLA-PEG nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID29324305
PMCPMC5801148
OpenAlexW2777296577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.