Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29323863›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice2018

At-a-glance - "A tough sell": findings from a qualitative analysis on the provision of healthy foods in recreation and sports settings.

Jessie-Lee D McIsaac, Sherry L Jarvis, Rebecca Spencer, Sara Fl Kirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recreation Facility Food and Beverage Environments in Ontario, Canada: An Appeal for Policy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Editorial - Seeking a new 'normal' in the Canadian food environment.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessie-Lee D McIsaacHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Sherry L JarvisHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Rebecca SpencerSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Sara Fl KirkHealthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recreation and sport settings (RSS) typically promote health in the form of physical activity, but the healthfulness of their food environment is often neglected. We explored stakeholder perspectives on barriers to healthy food provision in RSS through telephone interviews with ten representatives from RSS across Nova Scotia. Three key barriers were identified: 1) cultural norms associated with food in RSS and the broader environment, 2) the persisting notion of personal choice and responsibility, and 3) financial implications of healthy food provision. These barriers challenge healthy food provision in RSS and require multi-faceted strategies to overcome social norms that undermine health behaviours.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFood ServicesRecreationSportsCanadaHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansPublic Facilitiesfood culturehealth promotionhealthy eatingnutritionpolicyrecreationsports

Identifiers

PMID29323863
PMCPMC5809108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.