Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29323831›Full record

Trial reportWMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin2017

Biking for Health: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of a Bicycling Intervention on Lower-Income Adults.

Rebecca Bernstein, Robert Schneider, Whitney Welch, Anne Dressel, Melissa DeNomie, Jennifer Kusch, Mirtha Sosa

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca BernsteinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, rbernstein@mcw.edu.
Robert SchneiderDepartment of Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Whitney WelchDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Anne DresselCollege of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Melissa DeNomieDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Jennifer KuschCollege of Health Sciences, Milwaukee Area Technical College.
Mirtha SosaBicycle Federation of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Clincal and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000055 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2012 to 2015
$11.3M
Cancer Prevention, Control, and Survivorship Research Training ProgramT32CA193193 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Brian L Hitsman, BETINA YANEZ · 2015 to 2026
$3.8M
University of Michigan Training Program in ELSI ResearchT32HG010030 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2018 to 2022
$962k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA193193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis pilot study tested the efficacy of a bicycling intervention targeting inactive, low-income, overweight adults on reducing perceived barriers to bicycling, increasing physical activity, and improving health.

methodsA nonblinded 2-site randomized controlled trial was conducted in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in summer 2015. Participants included members from 1 largely Latino community and a second primarily African American neighborhood. A certified bicycling instructor led a 12-week bicycling intervention. Outcome measures including biking-related attitudes, self-reported physical activity, fitness as measured by the 6-minute step test, and biometric data were collected at baseline, 12 weeks, and 20 weeks.

resultsThirty-eight participants completed the study. Barriers to bicycling declined significantly among intervention group participants at 12 weeks with some declines persisting to 20 weeks. Bicycling for leisure or non work transportation increased significantly more in the intervention than control group from baseline to 12 weeks but this difference attenuated by 20 weeks. Both groups increased their fitness between baseline and 12 weeks, with a trend towards greater gains in the bicycling intervention group. No significant change in biometric measurements was seen at either 12 weeks or 20 weeks.

conclusionDespite the small study size, this bicycling intervention decreased perceived barriers to bicycling and increased bicycling activity in low-income minority participants. These findings support a larger-scale study to measure fitness and health changes from bicycling interventions.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdultAgedBicyclingBlack or African AmericanExerciseFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedOverweightPilot ProjectsPoverty AreasSelf ReportWisconsin

Identifiers

PMID29323831
PMCPMC6130255
OpenAlexW2972704799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.