Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29323663›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2018

Multiplexed proteome analysis with neutron-encoded stable isotope labeling in cells and mice.

Katherine A Overmyer, Stefka Tyanova, Alex S Hebert, Michael S Westphall, Jürgen Cox, Joshua J Coon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine A OvermyerGenome Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Stefka TyanovaMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Alex S HebertGenome Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Michael S WestphallGenome Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jürgen CoxMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Joshua J CoonGenome Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Energy Center of Wisconsin · USMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DEMorgridge Institute for Research · US

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
TR&D 2 Metabolic Labels for Ultraplexed Protein Quantification p. 453P41GM108538 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COON, JOSHUA J · 2016 to 2025
$13.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM108538NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a protocol for multiplexed proteomic analysis using neutron-encoded (NeuCode) stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cells (SILAC) or mice (SILAM). This method currently enables simultaneous comparison of up to nine treatment and control proteomes. Another important advantage over traditional SILAC/SILAM is that shorter labeling times are required. Exploiting the small mass differences that correspond to subtle differences in the neutron-binding energies of different isotopes, the amino acids used in NeuCode SILAC/SILAM differ in mass by just a few milliDaltons. Isotopologs of lysine are introduced into cells or mammals, via the culture medium or diet, respectively, to metabolically label the proteome. Labeling time is ∼2 weeks for cultured cells and 3-4 weeks for mammals. The proteins are then extracted, relevant samples are combined, and these are enzymatically digested with lysyl endopeptidase (Lys-C). The resultant peptides are chromatographically separated and then mass analyzed. During mass spectrometry (MS) data acquisition, high-resolution MS

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsCells, CulturedHumansIsotope LabelingLysineMiceNeutronsPeptidesProteomeProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSerine EndopeptidasesSoftwareTandem Mass SpectrometryAmino AcidsLysinelysyl endopeptidasePeptidesProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSerine Endopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID29323663
PMCPMC5920564
OpenAlexW2783860661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.