Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29323263›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Putative sex pheromone of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, breaks down into an attractant.

Odimar Z Zanardi, Haroldo X L Volpe, Arodi P Favaris, Weliton D Silva, Rejane A G Luvizotto, Rodrigo F Magnani, Victoria Esperança, Jennifer Y Delfino, Renato de Freitas, Marcelo P Miranda and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Odimar Z ZanardiResearch and Development Department, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Vila Melhado, 14807-040, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Haroldo X L VolpeResearch and Development Department, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Vila Melhado, 14807-040, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arodi P FavarisDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.
Weliton D SilvaDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-204X
Rejane A G LuvizottoResearch and Development Department, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Vila Melhado, 14807-040, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo F MagnaniResearch and Development Department, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Vila Melhado, 14807-040, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Victoria EsperançaResearch and Development Department, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Vila Melhado, 14807-040, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jennifer Y DelfinoResearch and Development Department, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Vila Melhado, 14807-040, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato de FreitasResearch and Development Department, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Vila Melhado, 14807-040, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo P MirandaResearch and Development Department, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Vila Melhado, 14807-040, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Roberto P ParraDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.
José Mauricio S BentoDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.
Walter S LealDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. wsleal@ucdavis.edu.
Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under laboratory conditions, mating activity in Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) started 4 days after emergence, peaked at day 7, and showed a clear window of activity starting 8 h into the photophase and extending through the first hour of the scotophase. We confirmed that ACP males are attracted to emanations from conspecific females. Traps loaded with a candidate compound enriched with female extract, lignoceryl acetate (24Ac), at various doses were active only after being deployed for several weeks in the field, suggesting that a degradation product, not the test compound, was the active ingredient(s). Lignocerol, a possible product of 24Ac degradation, was not active, whereas acetic acid, another possible degradation product, was found in the airborne volatile collections from lures matured under field conditions and detected in higher amounts in volatiles collected from females at the peak of mating activity than in male samples. Acetic acid elicited dose-dependent electroantennographic responses and attracted ACP males, but not females, in Y-type and 4-way olfactometers. Field tests showed that acetic acid-baited traps captured significantly more males than control traps. Surprisingly, captures of females in acetic acid-baited traps were also higher than in control traps, possibly because of physical stimuli emitted by captured males.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidAnimalsArthropod AntennaeCitrusFemaleHemipteraMaleSex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalVolatile Organic CompoundsAcetic AcidSex AttractantsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID29323263
PMCPMC5764970
OpenAlexW2781825771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.