Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29323251›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Vitamin E inhibits the UVAI induction of "light" and "dark" cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, and oxidatively generated DNA damage, in keratinocytes.

George J Delinasios, Mahsa Karbaschi, Marcus S Cooke, Antony R Young

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterising the urinary excretion of thymidine dimer photolesions in mice.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Benefits and risks of hair, skin, and nail supplements in older adults.International journal of women's dermatology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Assessment of the Influence of UVR in Cutaneous Melanoma.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. UVA-light-induced mutagenesis in the exome of human nucleotide excision repair-deficient cells.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Chemiexcitation: Mammalian Photochemistry in the DarkPhotochemistry and photobiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Antioxidants in Sunscreens: Which and What For?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Triplet-Energy Quenching Functions of Antioxidant Molecules.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

George J DelinasiosKing's College London, St John's Institute of Dermatology, 9th Floor, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital; Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Mahsa KarbaschiOxidative Stress Group, Department of Cancer Studies, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Marcus S CookeOxidative Stress Group, Department of Cancer Studies, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. mcooke@fiu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0369-862X
Antony R YoungKing's College London, St John's Institute of Dermatology, 9th Floor, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital; Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK. antony.young@kcl.ac.uk.
Florida International University · USGuy's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced DNA damage has acute, and long-term adverse effects in the skin. This damage arises directly by absorption of UVR, and indirectly via photosensitization reactions. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of vitamin E on UVAI-induced DNA damage in keratinocytes in vitro. Incubation with vitamin E before UVAI exposure decreased the formation of oxidized purines (with a decrease in intracellular oxidizing species), and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD). A possible sunscreening effect was excluded when similar results were obtained following vitamin E addition after UVAI exposure. Our data showed that DNA damage by UVA-induced photosensitization reactions can be inhibited by the introduction of vitamin E either pre- or post-irradiation, for both oxidized purines and CPD (including so-called "dark" CPDs). These data validate the evidence that some CPD are induced by UVAI initially via photosensitization, and some via chemoexcitation, and support the evidence that vitamin E can intervene in this pathway to prevent CPD formation in keratinocytes. We propose the inclusion of similar agents into topical sunscreens and aftersun preparations which, for the latter in particular, represents a means to mitigate on-going DNA damage formation, even after sun exposure has ended.

Indexed as

Cell LineCell SurvivalDNA DamageGlutathioneHumansKeratinocytesOxidative StressPyrimidine DimersRadiation-Protective AgentsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysVitamin EGlutathionePyrimidine DimersRadiation-Protective AgentsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSunscreening AgentsVitamin E

Identifiers

PMID29323251
PMCPMC5764969
OpenAlexW2804969197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.