Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29323052›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2017

Quantification of intermuscular and intramuscular adipose tissue using magnetic resonance imaging after neurodegenerative disorders.

Madoka Ogawa, Robert Lester, Hiroshi Akima, Ashraf S Gorgey

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04273828 (Impact of Muscle Degeneration in Chronic Ow Back Pain in Patients Undergoing Neural Decompression), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04273828 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Muscle Degeneration in Chronic Ow Back Pain in Patients Undergoing Neural Decompression

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinRan2020 to 2025Enrolled168ConditionsLumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Disc Herniation, Radiculopathy, Back PainArmsLumbar decompressive surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Poor muscle quality: A hidden and detrimental health condition in obesity.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Myosteatosis: diagnostic significance and assessment by imaging approaches.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madoka OgawaGraduate School of Education & Human Development, Nagoya University, Nagoya; Society for Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Robert LesterSpinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC, Richmond, VA, USA.
Hiroshi AkimaGraduate School of Education & Human Development, Nagoya University; Research Center of Health, Physical Fitness and Sports, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Ashraf S GorgeySpinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ectopic adiposity has gained considerable attention because of its tight association with metabolic and cardiovascular health in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Ectopic adiposity is characterized by the storage of adipose tissue in non-subcutaneous sites. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven to be an effective tool in quantifying ectopic adiposity and provides the opportunity to measure different adipose depots including intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and intramuscular adipose tissue (IntraMAT) or intramuscular fat (IMF). It is highly important to distinguish and clearly define these compartments, because controversy still exists on how to accurately quantify these adipose depots. Investigators have relied on separating muscle from fat pixels based on their characteristic signal intensities. A common technique is plotting a threshold histogram that clearly separates between muscle and fat peaks. The cut-offs to separate between muscle and fat peaks are still not clearly defined and different cut-offs have been identified. This review will outline and compare the Midpoint and Otsu techniques, two methods used to determine the threshold between muscle and fat pixels on T1 weighted MRI. The process of water/fat segmentation using the Dixon method will also be outlined. We are hopeful that this review will trigger more research towards accurately quantifying ectopic adiposity due to its high relevance to cardiometabolic health after SCI.

Indexed as

ectopic adiposityintermuscular adipose tissueintramuscular adipose tissueintramuscular fatmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29323052
PMCPMC5784361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.