Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29322913›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping.

Trygve Bakken, Lindsay Cowell, Brian D Aevermann, Mark Novotny, Rebecca Hodge, Jeremy A Miller, Alexandra Lee, Ivan Chang, Jamison McCorrison, Bali Pulendran and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Gene panel selection for targeted spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Trygve BakkenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, Washington, 98103, USA.
Lindsay CowellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, USA.
Brian D AevermannJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Mark NovotnyJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Rebecca HodgeAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, Washington, 98103, USA.
Jeremy A MillerAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, Washington, 98103, USA.
Alexandra LeeJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Ivan ChangJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Jamison McCorrisonJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Bali PulendranDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, 201 Dowman Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Yu QianJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Nicholas J SchorkJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Roger S LaskenJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Ed S LeinAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, Washington, 98103, USA.
Richard H ScheuermannJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. RScheuermann@jcvi.org.

Funding

Systems Biological Analysis of Innate and Adaptive Responses to VaccinationU19AI090023 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI, LI, SHUZHAO · 2010 to 2021
$45.0M
Single-cell atlas of lung tissue-resident memory T cells reactive to upper and lower respiratory tract pathogensU19AI118626 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI Bjoern Peters · 2015 to 2026
$36.7M
Development of tools for cell-type specific labeling of human and mouse neocortical neuronsRF1MH114126 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI LEIN, ED, LEVI, BOAZ PIRIE · 2017 to 2017
$4.5M
Emory R38 Research Training ProgramR38AI140299 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI OFOTOKUN, IGHOVWERHA, ROUPHAEL, NADINE GEORGES · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
Somatic Mutation in the Etiology of Multiple SclerosisR21AI122100 · NIAID · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SCHEUERMANN, RICHARD H · 2016 to 2017
$552k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI122100NIAID NIH HHS R38 AI140299NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090023NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI118626NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA fundamental characteristic of multicellular organisms is the specialization of functional cell types through the process of differentiation. These specialized cell types not only characterize the normal functioning of different organs and tissues, they can also be used as cellular biomarkers of a variety of different disease states and therapeutic/vaccine responses. In order to serve as a reference for cell type representation, the Cell Ontology has been developed to provide a standard nomenclature of defined cell types for comparative analysis and biomarker discovery. Historically, these cell types have been defined based on unique cellular shapes and structures, anatomic locations, and marker protein expression. However, we are now experiencing a revolution in cellular characterization resulting from the application of new high-throughput, high-content cytometry and sequencing technologies. The resulting explosion in the number of distinct cell types being identified is challenging the current paradigm for cell type definition in the Cell Ontology.

resultsIn this paper, we provide examples of state-of-the-art cellular biomarker characterization using high-content cytometry and single cell RNA sequencing, and present strategies for standardized cell type representations based on the data outputs from these cutting-edge technologies, including "context annotations" in the form of standardized experiment metadata about the specimen source analyzed and marker genes that serve as the most useful features in machine learning-based cell type classification models. We also propose a statistical strategy for comparing new experiment data to these standardized cell type representations.

conclusionThe advent of high-throughput/high-content single cell technologies is leading to an explosion in the number of distinct cell types being identified. It will be critical for the bioinformatics community to develop and adopt data standard conventions that will be compatible with these new technologies and support the data representation needs of the research community. The proposals enumerated here will serve as a useful starting point to address these challenges.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesBiomarkersCellsComputational BiologyHumansSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisBiomarkersCell ontologyCell phenotypeCytometryMarker genesNeuronNext generation sequencingOpen biomedical ontologiesPeripheral blood mononuclear cellsSingle cell transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29322913
PMCPMC5763450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.