ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2018
Blood Glucose Monitoring Data Should Be Reported in Detail When Studies About Efficacy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Are Published.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Pooled it
- Beyond the CE Mark: A Call to Action for Minimum CGM Accuracy Standards in Central and Eastern European Nations.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Threshold of hyperglycaemia associated with mortality in critically ill patients: a multicentre, prospective, observational study using continuous glucose monitoring.Diabetologia · 2024Observational
- Glucose Profiles Assessed by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring System during the Perioperative Period of Metabolic Surgery.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2022Article
- Glycemic Metrics Derived From Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- The Impact of Recent Developments in Electrochemical POC Sensor for Blood Sugar Care.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
- Article
- Comment on Grino et al: Suitability of Flash Glucose Monitoring for Detection of Hypoglycemia.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019Article
- Response to "Blood Glucose Monitoring Data Should Be Reported in Detail When Studies About Efficacy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Are Published".Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019Article
- Article
- Self-measurement of Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Is There Only One Future?European endocrinology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, two clinical trials about a "sensor-based flash glucose monitoring system" and its efficacy in reducing time in hypoglycemia were published. Interestingly, patients spent more time at low glucose concentrations in these studies than in other studies related to the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM). Although it is possible that the study populations differed from those in other studies, another potential explanation is that the CGM system used in these two studies had a negative glucose measurement bias. Such a negative bias was reported in recent literature, suggesting that the CGM system may inaccurately indicate hypoglycemia. Reporting blood glucose monitoring data would help to interpret the CGM data at least in the context of time spent in various glucose ranges as a parameter with which quality of diabetes therapy is measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.