Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29322473›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

Pharmaceutical care and health related quality of life outcomes over the past 25 years: Have we measured dimensions that really matter?

Mohammed A Mohammed, Rebekah J Moles, Timothy F Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammed A MohammedFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, A15 Science Rd, Sydney, Australia. mmoh2116@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Rebekah J MolesFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, A15 Science Rd, Sydney, Australia.
Timothy F ChenFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, A15 Science Rd, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Several measures of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) have been used to evaluate Pharmaceutical Care (PC) interventions in the past decades. However, their suitability for evaluation of PC services has not been comprehensively evaluated. Aim of the review The aim of this review was to perform content analysis of HRQoL measures used in PC studies to gain an insight into their suitability for evaluation of PC services. Method PC studies evaluating HRQoL as a primary or secondary outcomes were retrieved based on a literature search of articles published from 1990 to 2015, on Medline, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Global Health, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Cinahl, HealthStar, Cochrane Library, AUSThealth, Australian Medical Index, and Current content. Measures of HRQoL used in the studies were identified and relevant information was extracted. A conceptual model of a patient reported Medication-Related Burden Quality of Life was used to guide the analysis. Results 117 studies were retrieved. Thirty-seven: 10 generic, 27 condition-specific HRQoL measures with a total of 1019 items about physical functioning (n = 430), psychological wellbeing (n = 288), social wellbeing (n = 119), physical burden (n = 69) and others (n = 113) were used in the studies. Only 34 of 1019 items were specifically related to medicines. Of these, the majority of items focused on other aspects of medicine such as adherence, rather than the burden imposed by medicine on quality of life. Conclusion A holistic analysis of HRQoL measures used in PC studies published over two and half decades provided a better insight into sensitivity and specificity of the measures to PC services. This review found that HRQoL measures used in PC studies provide a very limited coverage of themes related to the burden of medicine on quality of life. Therefore, may have limited potential for use as a sole humanistic measure when evaluating PC interventions. There is a scope for future research in the development of an alternative measure suitable for evaluation of the burden of medicine and the impact of PC interventions on quality of life outcomes.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansPharmaceutical ServicesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsContent analysisHealth related quality of lifeMedication-related burdenPatient reported outcome measurePharmaceutical care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.