Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29322321›Full record

ArticleOecologia2018

Polyphagy by omnivory: scavenging improves performance of a polyphagous caterpillar on marginal hosts.

Eric F LoPresti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric F LoPrestiDepartment of Entomology, University of California-Davis, Karban Lab, 380 Briggs Hall, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. lopresti.eric@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-0278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few species of insect herbivores are highly polyphagous, but those few species are disproportionately ecologically and economically important and include many of the most destructive crop pests. Common correlates of extreme polyphagy across insects include the related behaviors of cannibalism and omnivory, though any functional consequences of these behaviors on the host range are unknown. I hypothesized that omnivory may allow these insects to exploit marginal hosts successfully (an expansion of realized niche). Using the polyphagous pest caterpillar, Heliothis virescens, I tested the polyphagy by omnivory hypothesis using ten host plants of varying suitability and small quantities of insect carrion. Caterpillars which were allowed omnivory had increased performance on lower-quality hosts; this treatment raised survival, growth rate, and pupal mass over controls on a strictly plant diet. Omnivory allowed successful development on two plants that caterpillars could not exploit alone a potential niche expansion. This effect was limited, however: (1) on high-quality hosts, omnivory did not improve performance, and (2) omnivory on poor hosts did not increase growth rate or pupal mass to levels matching the most suitable hosts and it could not permit exploitation of a completely unpalatable plant. Omnivory may therefore be an important (and overlooked) factor in determining the success of generalist insect herbivores in a variety of ecological settings.

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsHerbivoryInsectaLarvaPupaCannibalismGeneralismHeliothis virescensHost rangeOmnivoryPlant–insect interactionsPolyphagyScavenging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.