Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29322255›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2018

[Electronic vision aids : New options for rehabilitation of the visually impaired].

N Celik, K Rohrschneider

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Current possibilities of visual rehabilitation].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N CelikUniv.-Augenklinik, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Nil.Celik@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
K RohrschneiderOphthalmologische Rehabilitation, Univ.-Augenklinik, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Augenklinik Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to technical advances, there has been an enormous improvement of electronic vision aids in recent years. New developments are especially small portable devices which can be easily carried. The majority of electronic vision aids serve as a reading aid. Electronic magnifiers are a portable alternative to conventional screen readers. In addition, there are mobile reading devices and special computer tools. Color recognition devices and barcode scanners are helpful in everyday life. Ultrasonic orientation systems enable the recognition of obstacles also at head height. Mechanisms incorporated in shoes even comprise a navigation system. A brand new development is OrCam (OrCam Technologies Ltd., Israel), a small, inconspicuous camera system which is attached to the spectacles. It transmits vision information as a text. Smart phones and tablet personal computers have meanwhile been developed to such an extent that they replace more expensive special vision aids. Due to the immense technical progress, electronic vision aids provide visually impaired people with many elegant functions and new possibilities for ophthalmological rehabilitation. Besides the technical, mobile and financial aspects, the social acceptance of the devices, which should be as unobtrusive as possible, plays an essential role.

Indexed as

Persons with Visual DisabilitiesSensory AidsVision, LowEyeglassesHumansReadingElectronic magnifierMagnifying visual aidsReading devicesSmart phonesTablet PC

Identifiers

PMID29322255
OpenAlexW2783352412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.