Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29322212›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2018

Meta-analysis on Materials and Techniques for Laparotomy Closure: The MATCH Review.

N A Henriksen, E B Deerenberg, L Venclauskas, R H Fortelny, M Miserez, F E Muysoms

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05041530 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Single Arm, Feasibility Study Using REBUILD Bioabsorbable™ for Closure of the Abdominal Wall After Oncologic Laparotomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbSolutions Med Inc.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsLaparotomyArmsREBUILD Bioabsorbable
NCT06501508 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Abdominal Wall Dehiscence After Laparotomy Closure in Abdominal Surgery: a Retrospective Observational Study on the Influence of the Suture Used

TypeobservationalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez DíazRan2023 to 2024Enrolled1,900ConditionsSurgical Wound DehiscenceArmsStratafix Symmetric
NCT06815822 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Postoperative Hernias in Emergency Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorJan Kochanowski UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsIncarcerated Hernia, Appendicitis Acute, Cholecystitis, Acute, Ileus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Fragility of Randomized Clinical Trials Using Small Bite, Small Walk Versus Large Bite, Large Walk in Laparotomy Closure.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Suture Techniques and Materials for Fascial Closure of Abdominal Wall Incisions: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

N A HenriksenDepartment of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark. nadiahenriksen@gmail.com.
E B DeerenbergErasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L VenclauskasLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
R H FortelnyDepartment of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, Medical Faculty, Wilhelminenspital & Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria.
M MiserezUniversity Hospitals, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
F E MuysomsAZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.
AZ Maria Middelares · BEErasmus MC · NLKU Leuven · BELithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTWilhelminen Hospital · ATZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate closure materials and suture techniques for emergency and elective laparotomies. The primary outcome was incisional hernia after 12 months, and the secondary outcomes were burst abdomen and surgical site infection.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted until September 2017. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated by at least 3 assessors using critical appraisal checklists. Meta-analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 23 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. There was no evidence from RCTs using the same suture technique in both study arms that any suture material (fast-absorbable/slowly absorbable/non-absorbable) is superior in reducing incisional hernias. There is no evidence that continuous suturing is superior in reducing incisional hernias compared to interrupted suturing. When using a slowly absorbable suture for continuous suturing in elective midline closure, the small bites technique results in significantly less incisional hernias than a large bites technique (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19, 0.86).

conclusionsThere is no high-quality evidence available concerning the best suture material or technique to reduce incisional hernia rate when closing a laparotomy. When using a slowly absorbable suture and a continuous suturing technique with small tissue bites, the incisional hernia rate is significantly reduced compared with a large bites technique.

Indexed as

SuturesAbdominal Wound Closure TechniquesElective Surgical ProceduresEmergenciesHernia, VentralHumansIncisional HerniaLaparotomyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound InfectionSuture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID29322212
OpenAlexW2783258121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.