ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2018
A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Studies of Oral Etoposide in Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pyrotinib combined with metronomic etoposide in heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a single-arm, phase II study.BMC cancer · 2024Trial
- Application of Polyphenols and Flavonoids in Oncological Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Targeting CD82/KAI1 for Precision Therapeutics in Surmounting Metastatic Potential in Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- Current Perspectives of the Applications of Polyphenols and Flavonoids in Cancer Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Metastatic brain tumors respond favorably to pyrotinib in a HER2-positive breast cancer following failure using trastuzumab.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOral etoposide has been used as a later line therapy for metastatic breast cancer for more than twenty years. Its efficacy and clinical usefulness has been suggested in small phase II studies in the metastatic breast cancer population and the drug has also the added advantage of convenient oral administration. Despite these advantages, the place of oral etoposide in treatment of metastatic breast cancer has been challenged in the last decade due to introduction of several other chemotherapeutics, including options available orally, as well as novel targeted therapies. This report pools the data on response rates and survival from all available oral etoposide studies in order to reach a more precise estimate of the clinical benefit of the drug. MATERIALS AND
methodsA review of the literature was performed for studies of oral etoposide in metastatic breast cancer. Data were extracted from eligible studies and summary statistics derived. Calculations of pooled response rates and survival estimates were performed according to a random or fixed effect model as appropriate.
resultsThe pooled estimate of Response Rate derived from twelve studies found in the English literature was 18.5% (95% CI 11.5-25.5%). The pooled estimate of Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) was 45.8% (95% CI 38.6-53.0%) and median Overall Survival (OS) approached 1 year. Summarized adverse effects profile data show an overall manageable toxicity.
conclusionThis pooled analysis provides evidence of a moderate clinical effectiveness of oral etoposide in metastatic breast cancer that could be useful in situations that options are limited but active treatment still appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.