Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321921›Full record

ReviewArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2018

Farming, Q fever and public health: agricultural practices and beyond.

Marcella Mori, Hendrik-Jan Roest

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of aInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  8. Pre-purchase screening forFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Infection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Antibody-Based Assessment ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Epidemiology of ZoonoticMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Endemicity ofHeliyon · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcella MoriBacterial Zoonoses of Livestock, Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, CODA-CERVA, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7191-9191
Hendrik-Jan RoestDepartment of Bacteriology and Epidemiology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the Neolithic period, humans have domesticated herbivores to have food readily at hand. The cohabitation with animals brought various advantages that drastically changed the human lifestyle but simultaneously led to the emergence of new epidemics. The majority of human pathogens known so far are zoonotic diseases and the development of both agricultural practices and human activities have provided new dynamics for transmission. This article provides a general overview of some factors that influence the epidemic potential of a zoonotic disease, Q fever. As an example of a disease where the interaction between the environment, animal (domestic or wildlife) and human populations determines the likelihood of the epidemic potential, the management of infection due to the Q fever agent,

Indexed as

Agricultural practicesControlCoxiella burnetiiOne healthSurveillanceTransmission

Identifiers

PMID29321921
PMCPMC5759282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.