Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2017

Cognitive-Motor Interference during Walking in Older Adults with Probable Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Thomas J Klotzbier, Nadja Schott

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05736016 (Influence of Medial Wedge Corrective Insoles Versus Sham Insoles on Gait Characteristics in Persons After Total Hip Replacement - Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05736016 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Influence of Medial Wedge Corrective Insoles Versus Sham Insoles on Gait Characteristics in Persons After Total Hip Replacement - Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, PolandRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsArthritis of Hip, Fracture of Femur, Aseptic Necrosis, DysplasiaArmsmedial wedge insoles ((corrective insoles are equipped with hard 10-degree medial wedge, while sham insoles are equipped with pliable 10-degree medial wedge)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cognitive, physical and emotional determinants of activities of daily living in nursing home residents-a cross-sectional study within the PROCARE-project.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An interrater reliability study of gait analysis systems with the dual task paradigm in healthy young and older adults.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Gait Performance as an Indicator of Cognitive Deficit in Older People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas J KlotzbierDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Institute for Sport and Exercise Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Nadja SchottDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Institute for Sport and Exercise Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
University of Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several studies have shown that dual-tasking (DT) mobility is impaired in Alzheimer's disease, studies on the effects of DT conditions in probable Mild Cognitive Impairment (pMCI) have not yielded unequivocal results. The objectives of the study were to (1) examine the effect of a concurrent task on a complex walking task in adults with cognitive impairment; and (2) determine whether the effect varied with different difficulty levels of the concurrent task. Furthermore, the study was designed to evaluate the Trail-Walking Test (TWT) as a potential detection tool for MCI. We examined DT performance in 42 young adults (mean age 23.9 ± 1.98), and 43 older adults (mean age 68.2 ± 6.42). The MoCA was used to stratify the subjects into those with and without pMCI. DT was assessed using the TWT: participants completed 5 trials each of walking along a fixed pathway, stepping on targets with increasing sequential numbers (i.e., 1-2-…-15), and increasing sequential numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-…-8). Motor and cognitive DT effects (DTE) were calculated for each task. ROC curves were used to distinguish younger and healthy older adults from older adults with pMCI. The TWT showed excellent test-retest reliability across all conditions and groups (ICC : 0.83-0.97). SEM% was also low (<11%) as was the MDC95% (<30%). Within the DT conditions, the pMCI group showed significantly longer durations for all tasks regardless of the cognitive load compared to the younger and the healthy older adults. The motor DTEs were greatest for the complex condition in older adults with pMCI more so than in comparison with younger and healthy older adults. ROC analyses confirmed that only the tasks with higher cognitive load could differentiate older adults with pMCI from controls (area under the curve >0.7,

Indexed as

cognitive reservedual task costsexecutive attention networkreliabilityTrail-Walking Testvisuo-spatial working memory

Identifiers

PMID29321738
PMCPMC5732228
OpenAlexW2774598205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.