Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321717›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health promotion and education2016

Engaging Canadian First Nations Women in Cervical Screening through Education.

Ingeborg Zehbe, Pamela Wakewich, Brianne Wood, Pauline Sameshima, Yvonne Banning, Julian Little

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health promotion and education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Highlighting strengths and resources that increase ownership of cervical cancer screening for Indigenous communities in Northern British Columbia: Community-driven approaches.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  6. Améliorer le dépistage chez les patients autochtones.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  7. Improving preventive screening with Indigenous peoples.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ingeborg ZehbeScientist, Thunder Bay Regional Research Institute, and Associate Professor, Health Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Pamela WakewichProfessor, Sociology and Women's Studies, Lakehead University; Professor, Human Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Brianne WoodPhD student, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pauline SameshimaAssociate Director, Centre for Place & Sustainability Studies, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Yvonne BanningNursing Student, Lakehead University, Fort William First Nation, Fort William First Nation, Ontario, Canada.
Julian LittleProfessor and Chair, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lakehead University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAAssembly of First Nations · CAHealth Sciences North · CA

Funding

CIHR 119344-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognition of the need to decrease cervical cancer rates in Indigenous populations has been ongoing-yet few successful interventions have been reported. In addition, literature addressing the challenges and barriers associated with designing screening programs aimed to specifically reach Indigenous women is limited. Here, we report findings from a mixed methods cervical cancer research project conducted in partnership with 10 First Nations communities in northwest Ontario, Canada. Individual interviews with community health professionals (the majority of whom identified as First Nations) stressed that awareness of cervical screening benefits is lacking. In contrast, focus group participants (women with no formal health education) emphasized the desire to learn more about the science of human papillomavirus (HPV), and that a positive HPV or abnormal Papanicolaou test need not mean a woman will undoubtedly develop cervical cancer. Both the health professionals and the focus group participants highlighted that sexual health education must start early, in schools, preferably before girls are sexually active and that it has to continue throughout life to create a

Indexed as

Cervical ScreeningFirst Nations WomenHealth EducationHuman PapillomavirusIndigenous Health

Identifiers

PMID29321717
PMCPMC5758335
OpenAlexW2346968698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.