ReviewNoro psikiyatri arsivi2017
Sensorimotor Integration During Motor Learning: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies.
Review in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of postural control through nonlinear methods in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.PeerJ · 2026Trial
- Bilateral Mechanoreception Discrimination based on Bihemispheric Somatosensory Response Patterns is Associated with Proprioception and Motor Function After Stroke.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- On the impact of tactile processing on motor cortex: how touch shapes motor behaviour.Brain structure & function · 2026Review
- Intermittent phrenic afferent activation induces phrenic motor plasticity.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Methodological optimization for eliciting robust median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials for realtime single trial applications.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- Effect of Neck Muscle Vibration Prior to Motor Learning on Short-Latency SEP Peak Amplitudes and Motor Performance.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Kinesio taping to address post-sternotomy scars in pediatric patients: A case report.Scars, burns & healingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of sensory signals coming from skin and muscle afferents on the sensorimotor cortical networks is entitled as sensory-motor integration (SMI). SMI can be studied electrophysiologically by the motor cortex excitability changes in response to peripheral sensory stimulation. These changes include the periods of short afferent inhibition (SAI), afferent facilitation (AF), and late afferent inhibition (LAI). During the early period of motor skill acquisition, motor cortex excitability increases and changes occur in the area covered by the relevant zone of the motor cortex. In the late period, these give place to the morphological changes, such as synaptogenesis. SAI decreases during learning the motor skills, while LAI increases during motor activity. In this review, the role of SMI in the process of motor learning and transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques performed for studying SMI is summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.