Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321616›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Defocus and magnification dependent variation of TEM image astigmatism.

Rui Yan, Kunpeng Li, Wen Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rui YanMarkey Center for Structural Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Kunpeng LiMarkey Center for Structural Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Wen JiangMarkey Center for Structural Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. jiang12@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1292-2411

Funding

HBGA receptors in host cell entry and infection of norovirusR01AI111095 · NIAID · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, WEN, JIANG, XI · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daily alignment of the microscope is a prerequisite to reaching optimal lens conditions for high resolution imaging in cryo-EM. In this study, we have investigated how image astigmatism varies with the imaging conditions (e.g. defocus, magnification). We have found that the large change of defocus/magnification between visual correction of astigmatism and subsequent data collection tasks, or during data collection, will inevitably result in undesirable astigmatism in the final images. The dependence of astigmatism on the imaging conditions varies significantly from time to time, so that it cannot be reliably compensated by pre-calibration of the microscope. Based on these findings, we recommend that the same magnification and the median defocus of the intended defocus range for final data collection are used in the objective lens astigmatism correction task during microscope alignment and in the focus mode of the iterative low-dose imaging. It is also desirable to develop a fast, accurate method that can perform dynamic correction of the astigmatism for different intended defocuses during automated imaging. Our findings also suggest that the slope of astigmatism changes caused by varying defocuses can be used as a convenient measurement of objective lens rotation symmetry and potentially an acceptance test of new electron microscopes.

Indexed as

AstigmatismAlgorithmsCryoelectron MicroscopyMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID29321616
PMCPMC5762780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.