Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321557›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Haptic shape discrimination and interhemispheric communication.

Catherine J Dowell, J Farley Norman, Jackie R Moment, Lindsey M Shain, Hideko F Norman, Flip Phillips, Astrid M L Kappers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Divided attention in the tactile modality.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine J DowellWestern Kentucky University, Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101-2030, USA.
J Farley NormanWestern Kentucky University, Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101-2030, USA. farley.norman@wku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-1914
Jackie R MomentWestern Kentucky University, Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101-2030, USA.
Lindsey M ShainWestern Kentucky University, Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101-2030, USA.
Hideko F NormanWestern Kentucky University, Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101-2030, USA.
Flip PhillipsSkidmore College, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience Program, Saratoga Springs, New York, 12866, USA.
Astrid M L KappersVrije Universiteit, Department of Human Movement Sciences, MOVE Research Institute, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Western Kentucky University · USSkidmore College · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In three experiments participants haptically discriminated object shape using unimanual (single hand explored two objects) and bimanual exploration (both hands were used, but each hand, left or right, explored a separate object). Such haptic exploration (one versus two hands) requires somatosensory processing in either only one or both cerebral hemispheres; previous studies related to the perception of shape/curvature found superior performance for unimanual exploration, indicating that shape comparison is more effective when only one hemisphere is utilized. The current results, obtained for naturally shaped solid objects (bell peppers, Capsicum annuum) and simple cylindrical surfaces demonstrate otherwise: bimanual haptic exploration can be as effective as unimanual exploration, showing that there is no necessary reduction in ability when haptic shape comparison requires interhemispheric communication. We found that while successive bimanual exploration produced high shape discriminability, the participants' bimanual performance deteriorated for simultaneous shape comparisons. This outcome suggests that either interhemispheric interference or the need to attend to multiple objects simultaneously reduces shape discrimination ability. The current results also reveal a significant effect of age: older adults' shape discrimination abilities are moderately reduced relative to younger adults, regardless of how objects are manipulated (left hand only, right hand only, or bimanual exploration).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleForm PerceptionHandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29321557
PMCPMC5762789
OpenAlexW2781861568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.