ArticleScientific reports2018
A Gaussian extension for Diffraction Enhanced Imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the equivalence of the X-ray scattering retrieval with beam tracking and analyser-based imaging using a synchrotron source.Journal of physics D: Applied physics · 2023Article
- Crystal optics simulations for delineation of the three-dimensional cellular nuclear distribution using analyzer-based refraction-contrast computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Diffraction Enhanced Imaging Analysis with Pseudo-Voigt Fit Function.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlike conventional x-ray attenuation one of the advantages of phase contrast x-ray imaging is its capability of extracting useful physical properties of the sample. In particular the possibility to obtain information from small angle scattering about unresolvable structures with sub-pixel resolution sensitivity has drawn attention for both medical and material science applications. We report on a novel algorithm for the analyzer based x-ray phase contrast imaging modality, which allows the robust separation of absorption, refraction and scattering effects from three measured x-ray images. This analytical approach is based on a simple Gaussian description of the analyzer transmission function and this method is capable of retrieving refraction and small angle scattering angles in the full angular range typical of biological samples. After a validation of the algorithm with a simulation code, which demonstrated the potential of this highly sensitive method, we have applied this theoretical framework to experimental data on a phantom and biological tissues obtained with synchrotron radiation. Owing to its extended angular acceptance range the algorithm allows precise assessment of local scattering distributions at biocompatible radiation doses, which in turn might yield a quantitative characterization tool with sufficient structural sensitivity on a submicron length scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.