Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321512›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Phenotypic responses to interspecies competition and commensalism in a naturally-derived microbial co-culture.

Nymul Khan, Yukari Maezato, Ryan S McClure, Colin J Brislawn, Jennifer M Mobberley, Nancy Isern, William B Chrisler, Lye Meng Markillie, Brett M Barney, Hyun-Seob Song and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Co-existence of two antibiotic-producing marine bacteria:Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Metabolic modelling approaches for describing and engineering microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nymul KhanBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Yukari MaezatoBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Ryan S McClureBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Colin J BrislawnBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Jennifer M MobberleyBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Nancy IsernEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
William B ChrislerBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Lye Meng MarkillieEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Brett M BarneyDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Hyun-Seob SongBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2154-6358
William C NelsonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1873-3929
Hans C BernsteinBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA. Hans.Bernstein@pnnl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-7708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental question of whether different microbial species will co-exist or compete in a given environment depends on context, composition and environmental constraints. Model microbial systems can yield some general principles related to this question. In this study we employed a naturally occurring co-culture composed of heterotrophic bacteria, Halomonas sp. HL-48 and Marinobacter sp. HL-58, to ask two fundamental scientific questions: 1) how do the phenotypes of two naturally co-existing species respond to partnership as compared to axenic growth? and 2) how do growth and molecular phenotypes of these species change with respect to competitive and commensal interactions? We hypothesized - and confirmed - that co-cultivation under glucose as the sole carbon source would result in competitive interactions. Similarly, when glucose was swapped with xylose, the interactions became commensal because Marinobacter HL-58 was supported by metabolites derived from Halomonas HL-48. Each species responded to partnership by changing both its growth and molecular phenotype as assayed via batch growth kinetics and global transcriptomics. These phenotypic responses depended on nutrient availability and so the environment ultimately controlled how they responded to each other. This simplified model community revealed that microbial interactions are context-specific and different environmental conditions dictate how interspecies partnerships will unfold.

Indexed as

Microbial InteractionsMicrobiotaPhenotypeBacteriaCoculture TechniquesGlucoseGlucose

Identifiers

PMID29321512
PMCPMC5762899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.