Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321268›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

Computational techniques for ECG analysis and interpretation in light of their contribution to medical advances.

Aurore Lyon, Ana Mincholé, Juan Pablo Martínez, Pablo Laguna, Blanca Rodriguez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03662802 (Development of a Novel Convolution Neural Network for Arrhythmia Classification for Shockable Cardiac Rhythms), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03662802 completednot on this map

Development of a Novel Convolution Neural Network for Arrhythmia Classification for Shockable Cardiac Rhythms

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorScripps ClinicRan2018 to 2020Enrolled25,458ConditionsArrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Arrest, Cardiac ArrythmiasArmsNeural Network Classifier
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Biometric contrastive learning for data-efficient deep learning from electrocardiographic images.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurore LyonDepartment of Computer Science, British Heart Foundation, Oxford, UK aurore.lyon@cs.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6019-7376
Ana MincholéDepartment of Computer Science, British Heart Foundation, Oxford, UK.
Juan Pablo MartínezBiomedical Signal Interpretation and Computational Simulation (BSICoS) Group, University of Zaragoza, CIBER-BBN, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pablo LagunaBiomedical Signal Interpretation and Computational Simulation (BSICoS) Group, University of Zaragoza, CIBER-BBN, Zaragoza, Spain.
Blanca RodriguezDepartment of Computer Science, British Heart Foundation, Oxford, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/P001076/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widely developed for clinical screening, electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings capture the cardiac electrical activity from the body surface. ECG analysis can therefore be a crucial first step to help diagnose, understand and predict cardiovascular disorders responsible for 30% of deaths worldwide. Computational techniques, and more specifically machine learning techniques and computational modelling are powerful tools for classification, clustering and simulation, and they have recently been applied to address the analysis of medical data, especially ECG data. This review describes the computational methods in use for ECG analysis, with a focus on machine learning and 3D computer simulations, as well as their accuracy, clinical implications and contributions to medical advances. The first section focuses on heartbeat classification and the techniques developed to extract and classify abnormal from regular beats. The second section focuses on patient diagnosis from whole recordings, applied to different diseases. The third section presents real-time diagnosis and applications to wearable devices. The fourth section highlights the recent field of personalized ECG computer simulations and their interpretation. Finally, the discussion section outlines the challenges of ECG analysis and provides a critical assessment of the methods presented. The computational methods reported in this review are a strong asset for medical discoveries and their translation to the clinical world may lead to promising advances.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyHumansclassificationcomputer simulationselectrocardiograminterpretation and analysismachine learning

Identifiers

PMID29321268
PMCPMC5805987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.