Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321249›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2018

Facing each other: mammal mothers and infants prefer the position favouring right hemisphere processing.

Andrey Giljov, Karina Karenina, Yegor Malashichev

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Brain Lateralization and Cognitive Capacity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrey GiljovDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia zoology.gilev@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7533-1600
Karina KareninaDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8200-6876
Yegor MalashichevDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-5712
St Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The right hemisphere plays a crucial role in social processing. Human mothers show a robust left cradling/holding bias providing greater right-hemispheric involvement in the exchange of social information between mother and infant. Here, we demonstrate that a similar bias is evident in face-to-face spatial interactions in marine and terrestrial non-primate mammals. Walruses and Indian flying foxes showed a significant population-level preference for the position which facilitates the use of the left visual field in both mother and infant. This behavioural lateralization may have emerged owing to benefits conferred by the enhanced right-hemispheric social processing providing the mother and infant an optimal perception of each other.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsCerebrumChiropteraFemaleMammalsMaternal BehaviorVisual PerceptionWalrusesbrain lateralizationcradling biasleft visual fieldmother–infant interactionsright hemisphere advantagevisual lateralization

Identifiers

PMID29321249
PMCPMC5803600
OpenAlexW2783853499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.