Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321239›Full record

ArticleOpen biology2018

Comparative genomic analysis of the 'pseudofungus'

Guy Leonard, Aurélie Labarre, David S Milner, Adam Monier, Darren Soanes, Jeremy G Wideman, Finlay Maguire, Sam Stevens, Divya Sain, Xavier Grau-Bové and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Combining different ion-selective channelrhodopsins to control water flux by light.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Guy LeonardLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-2064
Aurélie LabarreLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
David S MilnerLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Adam MonierLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Darren SoanesLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Jeremy G WidemanLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Finlay MaguireLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Sam StevensLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Divya SainDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92506, USA.
Xavier Grau-BovéInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC-UPF, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Arnau Sebé-PedrósWeizman Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9896-9746
Jason E StajichDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-0020
Konrad PaszkiewiczLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Matthew W BrownDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Neil HallSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Bill WicksteadSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4620-9091
Thomas A RichardsLiving Systems Institute, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK t.a.richards@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9692-0973
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of California, Riverside · USInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESMississippi State University · USUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

Acquisition of a Scalable Storage Cluster for Data Intensive NIH ResearchS10OD016290 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI GIRKE, THOMAS · 2014 to 2014
$593k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G00885X/1NIH HHS S10 OD016290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic microbes have three primary mechanisms for obtaining nutrients and energy: phagotrophy, photosynthesis and osmotrophy. Traits associated with the latter two functions arose independently multiple times in the eukaryotes. The Fungi successfully coupled osmotrophy with filamentous growth, and similar traits are also manifested in the Pseudofungi (oomycetes and hyphochytriomycetes). Both the Fungi and the Pseudofungi encompass a diversity of plant and animal parasites. Genome-sequencing efforts have focused on host-associated microbes (mutualistic symbionts or parasites), providing limited comparisons with free-living relatives. Here we report the first draft genome sequence of a hyphochytriomycete 'pseudofungus';

Indexed as

GenomePhylogenyAnimalsMolecular Sequence AnnotationRhinosporidiumWhole Genome Sequencinglarge DNA virusoomycete parasitic traitspolarized filamentous growthsecondary plastid endosymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29321239
PMCPMC5795050
OpenAlexW2784178653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.