Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321071›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2018

Head circumference - a useful single parameter for skull volume development in cranial growth analysis?

Markus Martini, Anne Klausing, Guido Lüchters, Nils Heim, Martina Messing-Jünger

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Quantitative intraoperative assessment of fronto-orbital advancement and remodelling in craniosynostosis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [The latest study on biomimetic mineralized collagen-based bone materials for pediatric skull regeneration and repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus MartiniDepartment of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. markus.martini@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5608-6980
Anne KlausingDepartment of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Guido LüchtersCenter for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Nils HeimDepartment of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Martina Messing-JüngerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asklepios Children's Hospital, Arnold-Janssen-Str. 29, 53757, Sankt Augustin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe measurement of maximal head circumference is a standard procedure in the examination of childrens' cranial growth and brain development. The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity of maximal head circumference to cranial volume in the first year of life using a new method which includes ear-to-ear over the head distance and maximal cranial length measurement.

methods3D surface scans for cranial volume assessment were conducted in this method comparison study of 44 healthy Caucasian children (29 male, 15 female) at the ages of 4 and 12 months.

resultsCranial volume increased from measurements made at 4 months to 12 months of age by an average of 1174 ± 106 to 1579 ± 79 ml. Maximal cranial circumference increased from 43.4 ± 9 cm to 46.9 ± 7 cm and the ear-to ear measurement increased from 26.3 ± 21 cm to 31.6 ± 18 cm at the same time points. There was a monotone association between maximal head circumference (HC) and increase in volume, yet a backwards inference from maximal circumference to the volume had a predictive value of only 78% (adjusted R

conclusionThe results demonstrate that for a distinct improvement in the evaluation of a physiological cranial volume development, the additional measurement of the ear-to ear distance using a measuring tape is expedient, and, especially for cases with pathological skull changes, such as craniosynostosis, ought to be conducted.

Indexed as

BiometryCephalometryChild DevelopmentCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleReference ValuesSkull3d scanCranial growthEar-to-ear measurementHead circumferenceSkull volumeValidity

Identifiers

PMID29321071
PMCPMC5764008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.