Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321058›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2018

Graphene oxide conjugated with polymers: a study of culture condition to determine whether a bacterial growth stimulant or an antimicrobial agent?

Ping-Ching Wu, Hua-Han Chen, Shih-Yao Chen, Wen-Lung Wang, Kun-Lin Yang, Chia-Hung Huang, Hui-Fang Kao, Jui-Cheng Chang, Chih-Li Lilian Hsu, Jiu-Yao Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization andPharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Graphene Oxide Thin Films with Drug Delivery Function.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. In Situ Hydrogels for Effective Treatment of Cancer: Strategies and Polymers Used.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ping-Ching WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC.
Hua-Han ChenDepartment of Food Science, National Penghu University of Science and Technology, Penghu 880, Taiwan, ROC.
Shih-Yao ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC.
Wen-Lung WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC.
Kun-Lin YangAthena Institute of Holistic Wellness, Wuyishan, 354300, Fujian, China.
Chia-Hung HuangMetal Industries Research & Development Centre, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan, ROC.
Hui-Fang KaoDepartment of Nursing, National Tainan Junior College of Nursing, Tainan 700, Taiwan, ROC.
Jui-Cheng ChangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC.
Chih-Li Lilian HsuDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC.
Jiu-Yao WangDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC. a122@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Ting-Mao ChouDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan, ROC. ed109842@edah.org.tw.
Wen-Shuo KuoDepartment of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC. wenshuokuo@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
National Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University · TWE-Da Hospital · TWMetal Industries Research & Development Centre · TWNational Penghu University of Science and Technology · TWNational Tainan Institute of Nursing · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-104-2314-B-006-076-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-106-2811-B-006-011the Aim for the Top University Project and the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan MOST-105-2812-8-006-002-the Aim for the Top University Project and the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan MOST-106-2119-M-006-008-the Aim for the Top University Project and the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan MOST-106-2119-M-038-001-the Aim for the Top University Project and the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan MOST-106-2221-E-006-002-
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe results showed that the deciding factor is the culture medium in which the bacteria and the graphene oxide (GO) are incubated at the initial manipulation step. These findings allow better use of GO and GO-based materials more and be able to clearly apply them in the field of biomedical nanotechnology.

resultsTo study the use of GO sheets applied in the field of biomedical nanotechnology, this study determines whether GO-based materials [GO, GO-polyoxyalkyleneamine (POAA), and GO-chitosan] stimulate or inhibit bacterial growth in detail. It is found that it depends on whether the bacteria and GO-based materials are incubated with a nutrient at the initial step. This is a critical factor for the fortune of bacteria. GO stimulates bacterial growth and microbial proliferation for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and might also provide augmented surface attachment for both types of bacteria. When an external barrier that is composed of GO-based materials forms around the surface of the bacteria, it suppresses nutrients that are essential to microbial growth and simultaneously produces oxidative stress, which causes bacteria to die, regardless of whether they have an outer-membrane-Gram-negative-bacteria or lack an outer-membrane-Gram-positive-bacteria, even for high concentrations of biocompatible GO-POAA. The results also show that these GO-based materials are capable of inducing reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent oxidative stress on bacteria. Besides, GO-based materials may act as a biofilm, so it is hypothesized that they suppress the toxicity of low-dose chitosan.

conclusionGraphene oxide is not an antimicrobial material but it is a general growth enhancer that can act as a biofilm to enhance bacterial attachment and proliferation. However, GO-based materials are capable of inducing ROS-dependent oxidative stress on bacteria. The applications of GO-based materials can clearly be used in antimicrobial surface coatings, surface-attached stem cells for orthopedics, antifouling for biocides and microbial fuel cells and microbial electro-synthesis.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriaColony Count, MicrobialFluorescenceGraphiteMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityOxidative StressPhotoelectron SpectroscopyPolymersReactive Oxygen SpeciesSpectrophotometry, UltravioletAnti-Infective AgentsGraphitePolymersReactive Oxygen SpeciesBiofilmChitosanGram-negative bacteriaGram-positive bacteriaGraphene oxideOxidative stressPolyoxyalkyleneamine

Identifiers

PMID29321058
PMCPMC5761102
OpenAlexW2782878097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.