Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29321010›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2018

Evaluation of five CAD/CAM materials by microstructural characterization and mechanical tests: a comparative in vitro study.

Nesrin Sonmez, Pinar Gultekin, Volkan Turp, Gokhan Akgungor, Deniz Sen, Eitan Mijiritsky

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nesrin SonmezBeykent University Vocational School, Dental Services, Dental Prosthesis Technology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pinar GultekinFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey. drpturkoglu@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2501-5826
Volkan TurpFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gokhan AkgungorFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Deniz SenFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eitan MijiritskySackler Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Istanbul University · TRBeykent University · TRFatih University · TRTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

Bilimsel Araştirma Projeleri Birimi, Istanbul Üniversitesi 43086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolymer infiltrated ceramics and nano-ceramic resins are the new restorative materials which have been developed in order to enhance the adverse properties of glass-matrix ceramics and resin composites. The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the characteristics of various CAD/CAM materials through mechanical, microstructural, and SEM analysis.

methodsFive test groups (n = 22) were formed by using the indicated CAD/CAM blocks: VITA Enamic (VITA Zahnfabrik), Lava Ultimate (3 M ESPE), IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent), IPS Empress CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent), and VITA Mark II (VITA Zahnfabrik). Two specimens from each test group were used for XRD and EDS analysis. Remaining samples were divided into two subgroups (n = 10). One subgroup specimens were thermocycled (5 °C to 55 °C, 30s, 10,000 cycles) whereas the other were not. All of the specimens were evaluated in terms of flexural strength, Vickers hardness, and fracture toughness. Results were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD, and Student's t tests (α = .05). Fractured specimens were evaluated using SEM.

resultsThe highest Vickers microhardness value was found for VITA Mark II (p < .001), however flexural strength and fracture toughness results were lowest conversely (p < .05). IPS e.max CAD was found to have the highest flexural strength (p < .001). Fracture toughness of IPS e.max CAD was also higher than other tested block materials (p < .001). Lava Ultimate and VITA Enamic's mechanical properties were affected negatively from thermocycling (p < .05). Microhardness, flexural strength, and fracture toughness values of Lava Ultimate and VITA Enamic were found to be similar to VITA Mark II and IPS Empress CAD groups.

conclusionsIt should be realised that simulated aging process seem to affect ceramic-polymer composite materials more significantly than glass ceramics.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignCeramicsDental PorcelainDental Prosthesis DesignDental Stress AnalysisHardnessIn Vitro TechniquesMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningResin CementsTensile StrengthDental PorcelainIPS e.max CAD LTIvoclar Universal CementResin CementsVITA EnamicVita Mark IICAD/CAMCeramic-polymerNano-ceramic resinThermocycling

Identifiers

PMID29321010
PMCPMC5764017
OpenAlexW2783114256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.