Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29320998›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth.

Lucy Lewis, Yvonne L Hauck, Caroline Crichton, Courtney Barnes, Corrinne Poletti, Helen Overing, Louise Keyes, Brooke Thomson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy LewisSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, 6102, Australia. Lucy.lewis@curtin.edu.au.
Yvonne L HauckSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, 6102, Australia.
Caroline CrichtonKing Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Courtney BarnesKing Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Corrinne PolettiKing Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Helen OveringKing Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Louise KeyesKing Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Brooke ThomsonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, 6102, Australia.
King Edward Memorial Hospital · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a gap in knowledge and understanding relating to the experiences of women exposed to the opportunity of waterbirth. Our aim was to explore the perceptions and experiences of women who achieved or did not achieve their planned waterbirth.

methodsAn exploratory design using critical incident techniques was conducted between December 2015 and July 2016, in the birth centre of the tertiary public maternity hospital in Western Australia. Women were telephoned 6 weeks post birth. Demographic data included: age; education; parity; and previous birth mode. Women were also asked the following: what made you choose to plan a waterbirth?; what do you think contributed to you having (or not having) a waterbirth?; and which three words would you use to describe your birth experience? Frequency distributions and univariate comparisons were employed for quantitative data. Thematic analysis was undertaken to extract common themes from the interviews.

resultsA total of 31% (93 of 296) of women achieved a waterbirth and 69% (203 of 296) did not. Multiparous women were more likely to achieve a waterbirth (57% vs 32%; p < 0.001). Women who achieved a waterbirth were less likely to have planned a waterbirth for pain relief (38% vs 52%; p = 0.24). The primary reasons women gave for planning a waterbirth were: pain relief; they liked the idea; it was associated with a natural birth; it provided a relaxing environment; and it was recommended. Two fifths (40%) of women who achieved a waterbirth suggested support was the primary reason they achieved their waterbirth, with the midwife named as the primary support person by 34 of 37 women. Most (66%) women who did not achieve a waterbirth perceived this was because they experienced an obstetric complication. The words women used to describe their birth were coded as: affirming; distressing; enduring; natural; quick; empowering; and long.

conclusionsImmersion in water for birth facilitates a shift of focus from high risk obstetric-led care to low risk midwifery-led care. It also facilitates evidence based, respectful midwifery care which in turn optimises the potential for women to view their birthing experience through a positive lens.

Indexed as

AdultBirthing CentersDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitals, MaternityHumansImmersionMidwiferyNatural ChildbirthParityPerceptionPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesWaterWestern AustraliaWaterBirth experienceIntrapartum careMidwifery-led careWaterbirth

Identifiers

PMID29320998
PMCPMC5763519
OpenAlexW2782711458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.