Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29320966›Full record

SynthesisJournal of telemedicine and telecare2018

Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review.

Clemens Scott Kruse, Priyanka Karem, Kelli Shifflett, Lokesh Vegi, Karuna Ravi, Matthew Brooks

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 811 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
811citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05443074 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a Face-to-face Versus a Remote Physiotherapy Instruction Session About Pelvic Floor in the Pelvic Floor Muscle Capacity of Incontinent Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2023 to 2025Enrolled92ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsFace to face intervention group, Remote intervention group, Control group
NCT06558591 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Potential Impact of an Individualized Exercise Program Via a Telerehabilitation Device in Chronic Patients: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLimoges UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Disease, Chronic Condition, Stroke Sequelae, Age ProblemArmsTelerehabilitation intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

811 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Telerehabilitation for neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

751 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clemens Scott KruseTexas State University, Texas, USA.
Priyanka KaremTexas State University, Texas, USA.
Kelli ShifflettTexas State University, Texas, USA.
Lokesh VegiTexas State University, Texas, USA.
Karuna RaviTexas State University, Texas, USA.
Matthew BrooksTexas State University, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and objective Studies on telemedicine have shown success in reducing the geographical and time obstacles incurred in the receipt of care in traditional modalities with the same or greater effectiveness; however, there are several barriers that need to be addressed in order for telemedicine technology to spread. The aim of this review is to evaluate barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide through the analysis of published work. Methods The authors conducted a systematic literature review by extracting the data from the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and PubMed (MEDLINE) research databases. The reviewers in this study analysed 30 articles (nine from CINAHL and 21 from Medline) and identified barriers found in the literature. This review followed the checklist from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2009. The reviewers organized the results into one table and five figures that depict the data in different ways, organized by: barrier, country-specific barriers, organization-specific barriers, patient-specific barriers, and medical-staff and programmer-specific barriers. Results The reviewers identified 33 barriers with a frequency of 100 occurrences through the 30 articles. The study identified the issues with technically challenged staff (11%), followed by resistance to change (8%), cost (8%), reimbursement (5%), age of patient (5%), and level of education of patient (5%). All other barriers occurred at or less than 4% of the time. Discussion and conclusions Telemedicine is not yet ubiquitous, and barriers vary widely. The top barriers are technology-specific and could be overcome through training, change-management techniques, and alternating delivery by telemedicine and personal patient-to-provider interaction. The results of this study identify several barriers that could be eliminated by focused policy. Future work should evaluate policy to identify which one to lever to maximize the results.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationAge FactorsAttitude of Health PersonnelGlobal HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSocioeconomic FactorsTelemedicineadoptionBarriersimplementationmHealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID29320966
PMCPMC5768250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.