Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29320569›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Transcriptome profiling of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) leaves infected with powdery mildew.

Wei-Li Guo, Bi-Hua Chen, Xue-Jin Chen, Yan-Yan Guo, He-Lian Yang, Xin-Zheng Li, Guang-Yin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CmPlant direct · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. GWAS Reveals a Novel Candidate GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gene Mining for Conserved, Non-Annotated Proteins ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Expression of PumpkinFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei-Li GuoSchool of Horticulture Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xin Xiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0884-7260
Bi-Hua ChenSchool of Horticulture Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xin Xiang, China.
Xue-Jin ChenSchool of Horticulture Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xin Xiang, China.
Yan-Yan GuoSchool of Horticulture Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xin Xiang, China.
He-Lian YangSchool of Horticulture Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xin Xiang, China.
Xin-Zheng LiSchool of Horticulture Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xin Xiang, China.
Guang-Yin WangSchool of Horticulture Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xin Xiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cucurbit powdery mildew (PM) is one of the most severe fungal diseases, but the molecular mechanisms underlying PM resistance remain largely unknown, especially in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.). The goal of this study was to identify gene expression differences in PM-treated plants (harvested at 24 h and 48 h after inoculation) and untreated (control) plants of inbred line "112-2" using RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). The inbred line "112-2" has been purified over 8 consecutive generations of self-pollination and shows high resistance to PM. More than 7600 transcripts were examined in pumpkin leaves, and 3129 and 3080 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in inbred line "112-2" at 24 and 48 hours post inoculation (hpi), respectively. Based on the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway database and GO (Gene Ontology) database, a complex regulatory network for PM resistance that may involve hormone signal transduction pathways, transcription factors and defense responses was revealed at the transcription level. In addition, the expression profiles of 16 selected genes were analyzed using quantitative RT-PCR. Among these genes, the transcript levels of 6 DEGs, including bHLH87 (Basic Helix-loop-helix transcription factor), ERF014 (Ethylene response factor), WRKY21 (WRKY domain), HSF (heat stress transcription factor A), MLO3 (Mildew Locus O), and SGT1 (Suppressor of G-Two Allele of Skp1), in PM-resistant "112-2" were found to be significantly up- or down-regulated both before 9 hpi and at 24 hpi or 48 hpi; this behavior differed from that observed in the PM-susceptible material (cultivar "Jiujiangjiaoding"). The transcriptome data provide novel insights into the response of Cucurbita moschata to PM stress and are expected to be highly useful for dissecting PM defense mechanisms in this major vegetable and for improving pumpkin breeding with enhanced resistance to PM.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantAscomycotaCucurbitaDisease ResistanceGene LibraryGene OntologyMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPhotosynthesisPlant DiseasesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant LeavesRNA, PlantSequence Analysis, RNASignal TransductionPlant Growth RegulatorsRNA, PlantTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID29320569
PMCPMC5761878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.