Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29320487›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

Multicolor quantitative confocal imaging cytometry.

Daniel L Coutu, Konstantinos D Kokkaliaris, Leo Kunz, Timm Schroeder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multidimensional Imaging of Breast Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intravital Microscopy for Hematopoietic Studies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Fast and high-fidelitySTAR protocols · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel L CoutuDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4641-0115
Konstantinos D KokkaliarisDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9952-3463
Leo KunzDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7332-3343
Timm SchroederDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9320-0252
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multicolor 3D quantitative imaging of large tissue volumes is necessary to understand tissue development and organization as well as interactions between distinct cell types in situ. However, tissue imaging remains technically challenging, particularly imaging of bone and marrow. Here, we describe a pipeline to reproducibly generate high-dimensional quantitative data from bone and bone marrow that may be extended to any tissue. We generate thick bone sections from adult mouse femurs with preserved tissue microarchitecture and demonstrate eight-color imaging using confocal microscopy without linear unmixing. We introduce XiT, an open-access software for fast and easy data curation, exploration and quantification of large imaging data sets with single-cell resolution. We describe how XiT can be used to correct for potential artifacts in quantitative 3D imaging, and we use the pipeline to measure the spatial relationship between hematopoietic cells, bone matrix and marrow Schwann cells.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsBone and BonesBone MarrowImage CytometryImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiceMicroscopy, Confocal

Identifiers

PMID29320487
OpenAlexW2767482076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.