Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29319722›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2017

Pain and quality of life in breast cancer patients.

Weruska Alcoforado Costa, Michelly Nóbrega Monteiro, Janice França Queiroz, Ana Katherine Gonçalves

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04251507 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Virtual Reality During Breast Localization Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrisma Health-UpstateRan2021 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsBreast Neoplasm FemaleArmsOculus Go Virtual Reality Goggles
NCT05042999 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Virtual Reality During Breast Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrisma Health-UpstateRan2021 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsBreast Neoplasm FemaleArmsOculus Go Virtual Reality Goggles
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptomic Association of COL3A1Pain research & management · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comprehensive assessment of pain characteristics, quality of life, and pain management in cancer patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pain associated with breast cancer: etiologies and therapies.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Care Needs and Symptoms Burden of Breast Cancer Patients in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Worst Pain Intensity Among Cancer Patients.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weruska Alcoforado CostaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, BR.
Michelly Nóbrega MonteiroUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, BR.
Janice França QueirozUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, BR.
Ana Katherine GonçalvesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, BR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the influence of pain on quality of life in breast cancer patients.

methodsA cross-sectional study of 400 patients, including 118 without metastasis, 160 with loco-regional metastasis and 122 with distant metastasis. The instruments used were the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 and the Breast Cancer-specific 23 and short McGill Pain Questionnaire.

resultsIn total, 71.7% of patients reported pain. The most frequent sensory descriptor used by patients was 'jumping.' In the evaluative dimension, the main descriptor chosen was troublesome. The Global Health self-assessment showed pain to be inversely correlated with quality of life: the group without metastasis had a mean score of 55.3 (SD=24.8) for those in pain, which rose to 69.7 (SD=19.2) for those without pain (p=0.001). Subjects with loco-regional metastasis had score of 59.1 (SD=21.3) when in pain, and those without pain had a significantly higher score of 72.4 (SD=18.6) (p<0.001). Patients from the distant metastasis group showed similar results with a mean score of 48.6 (SD=23.1) for those in pain and 67.6 (SD=20.4) for those without pain (p=0.002). Regarding the association of pain intensity and quality of life, patients with distant metastasis and intense pain had the worst scores for quality of life with a functional scale mean of 49.9 (SD=17.3) (p<0.009), a Symptom Scale score of 50.0 (SD=20.1) (p<0.001) and a Global Health Scale score of 39.7 (SD=24.7) (p<0.006).

conclusionsPain compromises the quality of life of patients with breast cancer, particularly those with advanced stages of the disease.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultBrazilBreast NeoplasmsCancer PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPain MeasurementProspective StudiesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID29319722
PMCPMC5738557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.