Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29319215›Full record

Observational studyJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2018

Considerations of prescribers and pharmacists for the use of non-selective β-blockers in asthma and COPD patients: An explorative study.

Esther Kuipers, Michel Wensing, Peter A G M De Smet, Martina Teichert

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. The safety of cardioselective βERJ open research · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Esther KuipersDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0316-1278
Michel WensingDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter A G M De SmetDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martina TeichertDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-3325
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND

objectivesDespite recommendations in prevailing guidelines to avoid the use of non-selective (NS) β-blockers in patients with asthma or COPD, on average, 10 patients per community pharmacy receive NS β-blockers monthly. The aim of our study was to identify the reasons of prescribers and pharmacists to treat asthma and COPD patients with NS β-blockers.

methodsFifty-three community pharmacists in the Netherlands selected patients with actual concurrent use of inhalation medication and NS β-blockers. For at least 5 patients, each pharmacist screened all medication surveillance signals and actions taken at first dispensing. Each pharmacist selected 3 different initial prescribers for a short interview to explore their awareness of the co-morbidity and reasons to apply NS β-blockers.

resultsPharmacists identified 827 asthma/COPD patients with actual use of NS β-blockers. From these, 153 NS β-blocker prescribers were selected and interviewed (64 general practitioners, 45 ophthalmologists, 24 cardiologists, and 20 other prescribers). One hundred seven prescribers were aware of the drug-disease interaction of the asthma or COPD co-morbidity when initiating the NS β-blocker, and 46 were not. From these, 40 prescribers did not consider the contraindication to be relevant. For 299 patients, medication surveillance signals and actions at first dispensing were retrieved. Patients used predominantly ocular timolol (39.8%), and the oral preparations propranolol (30.8%) and carvedilol (15.1%). In 154 cases, the pharmacy system generated a warning alert.

conclusionsA substantial number of prescribers was unaware of the co-morbidity or did not regard NS β-blockers contraindicated, despite prevailing clinical guidelines. Improvement programs should target prescribers' awareness and knowledge of NS β-blockers in patients with asthma or COPD.

Indexed as

Administration, OphthalmicAdministration, OralAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsAsthmaDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleMedicineMiddle AgedPharmacistsPhysiciansAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsasthmaCOPDinhalationmedicationpharmacotherapyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID29319215
PMCPMC5901013
OpenAlexW2784034869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.