ReviewThe Journal of physiology2018
Ageing of the carotid body.
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carotid body measurement by computed tomography angiography: a cross-sectional population-based study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Blood supply of the human carotid body.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Oxygen transport across the lifespan of male Sprague Dawley rats.Biogerontology · 2025Article
- Structural Plasticity of the Carotid Body.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2023Article
- Experimental Evidence of AFrontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Protective effects of SS-31 against SDHB suppression-mitochondrial dysfunction-EndMT axis-modulated CBT sclerosis and progression.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training in Hypoxia and Normoxia in Healthy Male Volunteers: A Pilot Study.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Advances in cellular and integrative control of oxygen and carbon dioxide homeostasis.The Journal of physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ageing process is characterized by a decline in several physiological functions resulting in a reduced capability to maintain homeostasis. The lowered homeostatic capacity seems to involve the carotid body (CB), whose role is to modulate ventilation and tissue oxygen supply. It thus plays a prime role in all ageing processes. Ageing causes marked changes in CB morphology. In older animals, it is enlarged and shows a concomitant decrease in the percentage of chemoreceptor tissue, as well as a proliferation of type II cells. The carotid glomitis is present with aggregates of lymphocytes and fibrosis of the lobules. Type I cells are dehydrated, with a profound vacuolization, a shrinking nucleus, and lipofuscin accumulation. With increased age, human CB shows a reduction in the number and volume of mitochondria, fewer synaptic junctions between glomi, along with a reduction in CB content of neurotransmitters, leading to a sort of 'physiological denervation'. Ageing could be interpreted as a cumulative result of oxidative damage to cells, which derives from aerobic metabolism. Moreover, metabolic rate is tightly correlated with life duration; thus a loss in mitochondrial function is one of the prime factors affecting CB ageing processes. The age-related reduction in synaptic junctions might be a self-protective mechanism through which cells buffer themselves against an accumulation of reactive oxygen species. The correlation between hypoxia and the life duration of CB cells remains an open question until how and why cells sense oxygen is understood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.