Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29318514›Full record

SynthesisDrug safety2018

The Impact of Biologics and Tofacitinib on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatic Disease: A Systematic Literature Review.

Michael Nurmohamed, Ernest Choy, Sadiq Lula, Blerina Kola, Ryan DeMasi, Paola Accossato

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Tofacitinib: Real-World Data and Treatment Persistence in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Implications in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael NurmohamedDepartment of Rheumatology, Reade, VU University Medical Center, 3A50, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, 1056 AB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.nurmohamed@reade.nl.
Ernest ChoyCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Sadiq LulaEnvision Pharma Group, London, UK.
Blerina KolaPfizer, Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Ryan DeMasiPfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Paola AccossatoPfizer, Rome, Italy.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLCardiff University · GBIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (Italy) · ITPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRheumatic diseases are autoimmune, inflammatory diseases often associated with cardiovascular (CV) disease, a major cause of mortality in these patients. In recent years, treatment with biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), either as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, have become the standard of treatment. In this systematic literature review, we evaluated the effect of treatment with biologic or tofacitinib on the CV risk and outcomes in these patients.

methodsA systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for articles reporting on CV risk and events in patients with rheumatic disease treated with a biologic agent or tofacitinib. Articles identified were subjected to two levels of screening. Articles that passed the first level based on title and abstract were assessed on full-text evaluation. The quality of randomized clinical trials was assessed by Jadad scoring system and the quality of the other studies and abstracts was assessed using the Downs and Black instrument. The data extracted included study design, baseline patient characteristics, and measurements of CV risk and events.

resultsOf the 5722 articles identified in the initial search, screening yielded 105 unique publications from 90 unique studies (33 clinical trials, 39 prospective cohort studies, and an additional 18 retrospective studies) that reported CV risk outcomes. A risk of bias analysis for each type of report indicated that they were of good or excellent quality. Importantly, despite some limitations in data reported, there were no indications of significant increase in adverse CV events or risk in response to treatment with the agents evaluated.

conclusionsTreatment with biologic or tofacitinib appears to be well-tolerated with respect to CV outcomes in these patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicHumansPiperidinesProspective StudiesPyrimidinesPyrrolesRetrospective StudiesRheumatic DiseasesRisk FactorsAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsPiperidinesPyrimidinesPyrrolestofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID29318514
PMCPMC5938314
OpenAlexW2784049301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.