Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29318484›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

The exposure to water with cigarette residue changes the anti-predator response in female Swiss albino mice.

Letícia Silva Cardoso, Fernanda Neves Estrela, Thales Quintão Chagas, Wellington Alves Mizael da Silva, Denys Ribeiro de Oliveira Costa, Igor Pereira, Boniek Gontijo Vaz, Aline Sueli de Lima Rodrigues, Guilherme Malafaia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in neural circuits of innate fear defense behavior.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Toxicity of cigarette butts and possible recycling solutions-a literature review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Letícia Silva CardosoBiological Research Laboratory, Goiano Federal Institute-Urutá Campos, Urutá, GO, Brazil.
Fernanda Neves EstrelaBiological Research Laboratory, Goiano Federal Institute-Urutá Campos, Urutá, GO, Brazil.
Thales Quintão ChagasBiological Research Laboratory, Goiano Federal Institute-Urutá Campos, Urutá, GO, Brazil.
Wellington Alves Mizael da SilvaPost-Graduation Program in Cerrado Natural Resource Conservation and Biological Research Laboratory, Goiano Federal Institution-Urutaí Campus, Urutaí, GO, Brazil.
Denys Ribeiro de Oliveira CostaPost-Graduation Program in Chemistry, Goiás Federal University-Samambaia Campus, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Igor PereiraPost-Graduation Program in Chemistry, Goiás Federal University-Samambaia Campus, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Boniek Gontijo VazPost-Graduation Program in Chemistry, Goiás Federal University-Samambaia Campus, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Aline Sueli de Lima RodriguesPost-Graduation Program in Cerrado Natural Resource Conservation and Biological Research Laboratory, Goiano Federal Institution-Urutaí Campus, Urutaí, GO, Brazil.
Guilherme MalafaiaBiological Research Laboratory, Goiano Federal Institute-Urutá Campos, Urutá, GO, Brazil. guilhermeifgoiano@gmail.com.
Instituto Federal Goiano · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

CNPq 46780120142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that cigarette consumption affects much more than human health. Smoked cigarette butt (SCB) disposal into the environment can bring little-known negative biological consequences to mammals, since it contains many organic and inorganic toxic chemical constituents. Thus, we aim at assessing whether the ingestion of water with leached SCB for 60 days by female Swiss mice changes their defensive behavioral response to potential predators (cats and snakes). We worked with the following groups of animals: control (pollutant-free water), water with environmental concentration of SCB (1.9 μg/L of nicotine), and concentration 1000 times higher (EC1000×). Our data show that the treatments did not cause locomotor, visual, auditory, and olfactory deficit in the animals. However, we observed that the animals exposed to the pollutants did not present behavioral differences in the test session with or without the snake. On the other hand, animals in all groups showed defensive behavior when the test was conducted with the cat in the apparatus. However, female mice presented weaker response than the control. Thus, our data point towards the potential neurotoxic damage caused to mice who have ingested water with SCB residues, even at low concentrations.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental ExposureEscape ReactionFemaleHazardous WasteMiceModels, TheoreticalTobacco ProductsWater Pollutants, ChemicalHazardous WasteWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimal behaviorAnti-predator responsesAquatic pollutionCigaretteMammals

Identifiers

PMID29318484
OpenAlexW2783661703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.