Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29318426›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Determining procedures for simulation-based training in radiology: a nationwide needs assessment.

Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Kristina Rue Nielsen, Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Charlotte Paltved, Karen Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen, Bjørn Ulrik Nielsen, Lars Konge

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leizl Joy NayahanganCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark. leizl.joy.nayahangan@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6179-1622
Kristina Rue NielsenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elisabeth Albrecht-BesteDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael Bachmann NielsenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte PaltvedMidtSim - Centre for Human Resources, Central Region of Denmark and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karen Gilboe Lindorff-LarsenNordSim - Centre for Skills Training and Simulation, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Bjørn Ulrik NielsenSim-C - the Simulation Centre of Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lars KongeCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNew training modalities such as simulation are widely accepted in radiology; however, development of effective simulation-based training programs is challenging. They are often unstructured and based on convenience or coincidence. The study objective was to perform a nationwide needs assessment to identify and prioritize technical procedures that should be included in a simulation-based curriculum.

methodsA needs assessment using the Delphi method was completed among 91 key leaders in radiology. Round 1 identified technical procedures that radiologists should learn. Round 2 explored frequency of procedure, number of radiologists performing the procedure, risk and/or discomfort for patients, and feasibility for simulation. Round 3 was elimination and prioritization of procedures.

resultsResponse rates were 67 %, 70 % and 66 %, respectively. In Round 1, 22 technical procedures were included. Round 2 resulted in pre-prioritization of procedures. In round 3, 13 procedures were included in the final prioritized list. The three highly prioritized procedures were ultrasound-guided (US) histological biopsy and fine-needle aspiration, US-guided needle puncture and catheter drainage, and basic abdominal ultrasound.

conclusionA needs assessment identified and prioritized 13 technical procedures to include in a simulation-based curriculum. The list may be used as guide for development of training programs. KEY POINTS: • Simulation-based training can supplement training on patients in radiology. • Development of simulation-based training should follow a structured approach. • The CAMES Needs Assessment Formula explores needs for simulation training. • A national Delphi study identified and prioritized procedures suitable for simulation training. • The prioritized list serves as guide for development of courses in radiology.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceComputer SimulationCurriculumDelphi TechniqueDenmarkEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansNeeds AssessmentPatient SimulationRadiologyUltrasonographyUltrasonography, InterventionalCurriculumDelphi techniqueNeeds assessmentRadiologySimulation training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.