Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29318355›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2018

An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery Reduced Postoperative Pain and Unplanned Returns to Care After Discharge.

Aaron B Parrish, Sean M O'Neill, Steven R Crain, Tara A Russell, Deepak K Sonthalia, Vu T Nguyen, Armen Aboulian

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03992079 (A Single Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial for A Multimodal Enhanced Recovery Program in Anorectal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03992079 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Single Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial for A Multimodal Enhanced Recovery Program in Anorectal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsColorectal Disorders, Anorectal Disorder, Patient Satisfaction, Pain, PostoperativeArmsReCOVER Enhanced Recovery Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Returning to the emergency room: An analysis of emergency encounters following urological outpatient surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron B ParrishDepartment of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Sean M O'NeillDepartment of Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Steven R CrainDepartment of Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills, CA, USA.
Tara A RussellDepartment of Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Deepak K SonthaliaDepartment of Anesthesia, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA, USA.
Vu T NguyenDepartment of General Surgery, Southern California Permanent Medical Group, Baldwin Park, CA, 91367, USA.
Armen AboulianDepartment of Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills, CA, USA. armen.aboulian@kp.org.
UCLA Medical Center · USWoodland Hills Medical Center · USColorado Permanente Medical Group · USRobert Wood Johnson Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulatory surgery for anorectal procedures has been proven to be safe and effective. Specific perioperative pathways combining multiple interventions have been shown to optimize recovery and outcomes associated with inpatient colorectal surgery. However, there are no major studies describing and evaluating a standardized protocol for ambulatory anorectal surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for ambulatory anorectal surgery.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 14 Southern California Kaiser Permanente medical centers. An eight-item protocol including: preoperative education, preoperative distribution of prescriptions, preoperative carbohydrate treatment, multimodal analgesia, preferential use of monitored anesthesia care (MAC), routine use of local anesthesia/regional blocks, intraoperative restriction of intravenous fluids, and post-discharge phone call. Postoperative pain scores and preventable returns to the emergency department or urgent care were assessed.

resultsPostoperative pain scores were reduced when all eight elements of the protocol were delivered (p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, there was reduced postoperative pain when preoperative carbohydrate treatment was completed (p = 0.002), with MAC (p = 0.003), and when multimodal analgesia was used (p = 0.02). There were decreased preventable returns to the emergency department or urgent care when MAC was used (p = 0.03); there were more returns for constipation (p = 0.04) but fewer returns for pain (p = 0.002) after preoperative carbohydrate treatment. Local anesthesia was associated with fewer returns for constipation (p = 0.01).

conclusionsImplementation of a standardized ERAS protocol for ambulatory anorectal surgery decreased postoperative pain and unplanned return visits to emergency care.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresClinical ProtocolsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresAdultAnal CanalEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative CarePostoperative PainRectumRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29318355
OpenAlexW2784006874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.